2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12098-018-02851-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does India Need a Universal High-Dose Vitamin A Supplementation Program?

Abstract: High dose vitamin A (HDVA) concentrate began to be distributed in India in 1970 as a short-term, stopgap approach to reduce clinical signs of vitamin A deficiency. As this problem declined globally, the purpose of distributing them changed to the reduction of young child mortality. However, their impact on this has also declined, if not disappeared, as suggested in India by the enormous DEVTA study. This may be because of improved protection against and treatment of the main morbidity involved, measles and dia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The World Health Organization recommends high-dose vitamin A supplementation for infants and young children in places where vitamin A deficiency is a public health problem, as indicated by a prevalence rate of night blindness of 1% or higher in children 24–59 months of age, or in situations where vitamin A deficiency (serum retinol ≤ 0.7 µmol/L) is 20% or higher in infants and children 6–59 months of age. However, the policy and practice of administering high-dose vitamin A (defined as 25,000 to 50,000 IU vitamin A, equivalent to 7.5 mg and 15 mg retinol equivalents, respectively) to reduce child mortality has been strongly challenged and has led to reports of acute toxicity [180], ranging from increased intracranial pressure, bone demineralization and growth restriction, to mental retardation and death [181,182]. In a review of 21 studies evaluating the effect of vitamin A supplementation in community settings on all-cause mortality, 12 also reported cause-specific mortality for diarrhea and pneumonia and six reported measles-specific mortality.…”
Section: Could Other Risk Factors Be Involved?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The World Health Organization recommends high-dose vitamin A supplementation for infants and young children in places where vitamin A deficiency is a public health problem, as indicated by a prevalence rate of night blindness of 1% or higher in children 24–59 months of age, or in situations where vitamin A deficiency (serum retinol ≤ 0.7 µmol/L) is 20% or higher in infants and children 6–59 months of age. However, the policy and practice of administering high-dose vitamin A (defined as 25,000 to 50,000 IU vitamin A, equivalent to 7.5 mg and 15 mg retinol equivalents, respectively) to reduce child mortality has been strongly challenged and has led to reports of acute toxicity [180], ranging from increased intracranial pressure, bone demineralization and growth restriction, to mental retardation and death [181,182]. In a review of 21 studies evaluating the effect of vitamin A supplementation in community settings on all-cause mortality, 12 also reported cause-specific mortality for diarrhea and pneumonia and six reported measles-specific mortality.…”
Section: Could Other Risk Factors Be Involved?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, concerns have been raised about the sustainability of VAS programs. These questions have led some to recommend shifting the current policy supporting VAS toward a range of other interventions, including food-based approaches (e.g., fortification) or regular low-dose supplementation or even total cessation of current high-dose VAS ( 32 , 33 ). Other bodies have argued strongly against the last, until affected countries show impact on under-5 mortality rates ( 8 , 34 ).…”
Section: Current Status Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed above, the two tenets on which the recommendation for routine VAS were based (child mortality and VAD reduction) appear no longer to be valid. This has resulted in vigorous debate in the past few years, [5,11,13,19,20] with the new scientific evidence largely being ignored by the proponents of HDVAC. In our view, this is partly because many from both science and pharma have invested considerably in promoting HDVAC as a magic bullet against mortality.…”
Section: What Of the Possibility Of Harm In Hdvac Programmes?mentioning
confidence: 99%