2020
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aat4390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does inappropriate behavior hurt or stink? The interplay between neural representations of somatic experiences and moral decisions

Abstract: Embodied models suggest that moral judgments are strongly intertwined with first-hand somatic experiences, with some pointing to disgust, and others arguing for a role of pain/harm. Both disgust and pain are unpleasant, arousing experiences, with strong relevance for survival, but with distinctive sensory qualities and neural channels. Hence, it is unclear whether moral cognition interacts with sensory-specific properties of one somatic experience or with supramodal dimensions common to both. Across two experi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The amygdala is part of the primary olfactory cortex. The adjacent hippocampus is not part of the primary olfactory cortex, but it receives strong afferent input from the entorhinal cortex which is involved in olfactory processing [ 44 ]. The role of hippocampal volume changes in Alzheimer’s disease is well known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amygdala is part of the primary olfactory cortex. The adjacent hippocampus is not part of the primary olfactory cortex, but it receives strong afferent input from the entorhinal cortex which is involved in olfactory processing [ 44 ]. The role of hippocampal volume changes in Alzheimer’s disease is well known.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also fed the data to multivariate models predictive of subjective pain from brain activity estimated on independent datasets. More specifically, to maximize the comparability with our experiment, we choose the model from Sharvit et al (2020) derived from datasets obtained with the same device for thermal stimulation and the same MRI scanner than the present study. This is a non-linear model obtained by feeding principal components of brain activity into a Support Vector Regression with a radial basis function kernel.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is also possible that social isolation (as caused by the confinement) might elicit a different kind of experience than Cyberball exclusion. Indeed, whereas isolation reflects prevalently the limitation of social interactions, Cyberball-induced exclusion is a more heterogeneous experience, which includes evaluations about the others' behavior, intentions and morality, and associated emotional responses (Giner-Sorolla et al, 2018;Sharvit et al, 2020). Indeed, the analyses of hybrid expressions reveal a dissociation between Cyberballinduced exclusion and the grouping factor, with the former triggering to a broad slowness in response times, and the latter instead leading to marginally faster choices for pain-neutral hybrids.…”
Section: Social Isolation Affects Pain-specific Facial Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%