Does imaging correctly influence the surgical management in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Abstract

O1Utility of MRI in low and low to moderate density breasts with invasive lobular carcinoma Objective: To determine the feasibility of excluding MRI from the preoperative diagnostic pathway of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) in women with low and low to moderate density breasts on mammography. Methods: A total of 179 cases of ILC were diagnosed between 2009 and 2012. Forty-eight cases were identified as low and low to moderate density breasts. The study group includes 32 cases who underwent MRI. Parameters scrutinised include size and number of lesions on mammography, ultrasound and MRI, second-look ultrasound, type of surgery, further surgery and histology. Results: Twenty-nine cases had low to moderate density breasts and three had purely low density breasts. Average age of women was 64. Size of lesions ranged between 2 and 50 mm with an average of 20.14 mm. In 25/32 cases (78.12%) conventional imaging matched MRI. MRI identified additional disease in 7/32 (21.8%). This was predominantly in the form of satellites around the index lesion resulting in multifocality in 6/7. Four resulted appropriately in mastectomy. Two led to wider WLE appropriately. In one case, multicentric disease was correctly detected and subjected to mastectomy. Second-look ultrasound was recommended in 4/7 cases. All these cases had low to moderate density breasts on mammography and 6/7 cases measured more than 15 mm in size. Ultrasound matched MRI in one mammographically occult case and was subjected to appropriate WLE. In two cases there was much more disease than anticipated from conventional imaging and MRI (6.25%). Conclusion: Even in low and low to moderate density breasts where mammography has a higher exclusion value, MRI identified additional disease in 21.8% (7/32). O2Is ultrasound axillary staging less accurate in invasive lobular breast cancer than in ductal breast cancer? P Sankaye Objective: To identify whether axillary US is less accurate in invasive lobular breast cancer than in ductal breast cancer. Methods: Randomised cohorts of screening and symptomatic patients were retrospectively identified from histology records of 2010/11. Axillary US of 65 patients with primary breast cancers (BC) from each group of invasive lobular cancer (ILC) and invasive ductal cancer (IDC) were reviewed. Preoperative US-guided needle biopsy sampling was performed on abnormal lymph nodes (LN). Results: See Tables 1 and 2. Conclusion: The previous literature on this topic is inconclusive. Some authors have suggested axillary ultrasound in ILC may be less accurate than in IDC, with a higher false-negative axillary assessment rate. Another study concluded that axillary US accuracy rates in ILC were comparable with previous published studies of IDC, used FNA in all cases. We specifically compared accuracy rates of preoperative axillary staging between ILC and IDC in own institution, with 14G needle biopsy as the procedure of choice to sample abnormal nodes. We found that there is no statistical difference in accuracy in US axillary staging betwee...