Abstract:Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) reduces the incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) dementia (HAD), whereas the overall prevalence appears to have increased. Recent changes to diagnostic nosology have emphasized the presence of neurocognitive deficits. Uniform methods of ascertaining neuropsychological impairment and excluding confounding causes are critical to between-study comparison. We conducted a systematic review on all studies that use single-cohort prospective treatment effect desi… Show more
“…However, 1 year is not an unreasonable follow-up period, given that it has been shown that significant cognitive improvement is usually seen within 6 months of starting ART. [11] It could be argued that a selection bias exists in this study, in terms of excluding those participants not on suppressive ART regimens for ≥10 months. These participants may have had poorer cognitive function and therefore greater difficulty in accessing and adhering to ART.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] ART typically produces a significant improvement in neurocognitive status within 6 months of treatment. [11] This does not, however, imply a complete recovery in all cases. In fact, incident cases of cognitive dysfunction can still arise while patients are on suppressive ART regimens.…”
Background. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can give rise to a spectrum of neuropsychological impairments known collectively as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) has reduced the incidence of HIV dementia, the prevalence of milder forms of HAND has increased. It has been postulated that incomplete central nervous system (CNS) viral suppression or potential drug toxicity, both of which could be related to the CNS penetration effectiveness (CPE) of ART regimens, may contribute to this phenomenon. Objective. This study compared cognitive outcomes in clade C-infected HIV patients in South Africa treated for 1 year with ART regimens with differing CPE scores. Methods. We assessed 111 HIV-positive patients with varying levels of cognitive function at baseline (pre-ART) and then a year later. A neuropsychological battery was administered at both visits to derive global deficit scores. ART regimen data were collected at the follow-up visit. Some participants remained ART-naïve during this period, thus providing a non-treatment control group. Results. Significantly more ART recipients maintained or improved cognitive function compared with patients not on ART (p=0.017). There was no significant difference in cognitive outcomes between higher and lower CPE regimen groups (p=0.473). Conclusions. ART preserves or improves cognition in HIV-infected patients after 1 year, irrespective of the regimen's CPE. South Africa's current low CPE-scored first-line regimen performed as well as higher CPE-scored regimens. These findings are reassuring for South Africa, but larger, longer-term studies would be more definitive.
“…However, 1 year is not an unreasonable follow-up period, given that it has been shown that significant cognitive improvement is usually seen within 6 months of starting ART. [11] It could be argued that a selection bias exists in this study, in terms of excluding those participants not on suppressive ART regimens for ≥10 months. These participants may have had poorer cognitive function and therefore greater difficulty in accessing and adhering to ART.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] ART typically produces a significant improvement in neurocognitive status within 6 months of treatment. [11] This does not, however, imply a complete recovery in all cases. In fact, incident cases of cognitive dysfunction can still arise while patients are on suppressive ART regimens.…”
Background. The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) can give rise to a spectrum of neuropsychological impairments known collectively as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Although antiretroviral therapy (ART) has reduced the incidence of HIV dementia, the prevalence of milder forms of HAND has increased. It has been postulated that incomplete central nervous system (CNS) viral suppression or potential drug toxicity, both of which could be related to the CNS penetration effectiveness (CPE) of ART regimens, may contribute to this phenomenon. Objective. This study compared cognitive outcomes in clade C-infected HIV patients in South Africa treated for 1 year with ART regimens with differing CPE scores. Methods. We assessed 111 HIV-positive patients with varying levels of cognitive function at baseline (pre-ART) and then a year later. A neuropsychological battery was administered at both visits to derive global deficit scores. ART regimen data were collected at the follow-up visit. Some participants remained ART-naïve during this period, thus providing a non-treatment control group. Results. Significantly more ART recipients maintained or improved cognitive function compared with patients not on ART (p=0.017). There was no significant difference in cognitive outcomes between higher and lower CPE regimen groups (p=0.473). Conclusions. ART preserves or improves cognition in HIV-infected patients after 1 year, irrespective of the regimen's CPE. South Africa's current low CPE-scored first-line regimen performed as well as higher CPE-scored regimens. These findings are reassuring for South Africa, but larger, longer-term studies would be more definitive.
“…One systematic review reported that HAART can improve cognition among HIV-infected individuals [89], but a subsequent review suggested that antiretroviral therapy did not improve memory functioning and may even have a negative impact [90]. Thus, it will be important to clarify the impact that these medications have on neurocognitive functioning in order to tease out the unique contributions of marijuana use.…”
Section: Critique Of the Current Literature And Future Research Priormentioning
Background-The most robust neurocognitive effect of marijuana use is memory impairment. Memory deficits are also high among persons living with HIV/AIDS, and marijuana is the most commonly used drug in this population. Yet research examining neurocognitive outcomes resulting from co-occurring marijuana and HIV is limited.Objective-The primary objectives of this comprehensive review are to: (1) examine the literature on memory functioning in HIV-infected individuals; (2) examine the literature on memory functioning in marijuana users; (3) synthesize findings and propose a theoretical framework to guide future research. Results-Among HIV-infected individuals, memory deficits with medium to large effect sizes were observed. Marijuana users also demonstrated memory problems, but results were less consistent due to the diversity of samples.
Method-PubMedConclusion-A compensatory hypothesis, based on the cognitive aging literature, is proposed to provide a framework to explore the interaction between marijuana and HIV. There is some evidence that individuals infected with HIV recruit additional brain regions during memory tasks to compensate for HIV-related declines in neurocognitive functioning. Marijuana use causes impairment in similar brain systems, and thus it is hypothesized that the added neural strain of marijuana can exhaust neural resources, resulting in pronounced memory impairment. It will be important to test this hypothesis empirically, and future research priorities are discussed.
“…10,13-14 As yet there are no treatment guidelines for HAD, but it is generally accepted HAART improves cognition. 15 Whilst we await recommendations on specific ARV regimes or other treatments, we should initiate patients with HAD on ARVs. Given the burden of HAND and direct benefits of starting ARVs, there is an urgency to develop rapid screening tools to detect and monitor HAND.…”
The current paper reviews currently used and proposed nomenclature for neurocognitive disorders associated with HIV, and proposes a unitary system as well as recommends an operational approach to screening/diagnosing severe forms of HIV associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) in order to identify individuals who might benefit from antiretrovirals (ARVs). The terms HIV dementia complex, HIV-associated dementia (HAD) and HIV encephalopathy (HIE) are being replaced by more refined definitions for the spectrum HIV associated neurocognitive disorder (HANDs). The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) will introduce a further term-major neurocognitive disorder. The nosology can become very confusing as the terms are not exactly equivalent. Clinicians need guidance on how to interpret new terms to implement current legislation and treatment guidelines that use the old term HIE. As a WHO stage 4 disease, patients with HIE are eligible for ARVs irrespective of their CD4 count. However, there are no locally available operational criteria how to diagnose HIV encephalopathy (HIE). The updated terminology is preferred because it requires assessing cognition objectively with neuropsychological tests. It is recommended that the International HIV Dementia Scale be used to screen patients and to thereafter confirm diagnosis with further neuropsychological tests e.g. the trail making and digit span tests.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.