Does Higher Intensity Increase the Rate of Responders to Endurance Training When Total Energy Expenditure Remains Constant? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background Standardized training prescriptions often result in large variation in training response with a substantial number of individuals that show little or no response at all. The present study examined whether the response in markers of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) to moderate intensity endurance training can be elevated by an increase in training intensity. Methods Thirty-one healthy, untrained participants (46 ± 8 years, BMI 25.4 ± 3.3 kg m−2 and $${\dot{\text{V}}}$$ V ˙ O2max 34 ± 4 mL min−1 kg−1) trained for 10 weeks with moderate intensity (3 day week−1 for 50 min per session at 55% HRreserve). Hereafter, the allocation into two groups was performed by stratified randomization for age, gender and VO2max response. CON (continuous moderate intensity) trained for another 16 weeks at moderate intensity, INC (increased intensity) trained energy-equivalent for 8 weeks at 70% HRreserve and then performed high-intensity interval training (4 × 4) for another 8 weeks. Responders were identified as participants with VO2max increase above the technical measurement error. Results There was a significant difference in $${\dot{\text{V}}}$$ V ˙ O2max response between INC (3.4 ± 2.7 mL kg−1 min−1) and CON (0.4 ± 2.9 mL kg−1 min−1) after 26 weeks of training (P = 0.020). After 10 weeks of moderate training, in total 16 of 31 participants were classified as VO2max responders (52%). After another 16 weeks continuous moderate intensity training, no further increase of responders was observed in CON. In contrast, the energy equivalent training with increasing training intensity in INC significantly (P = 0.031) increased the number of responders to 13 of 15 (87%). The energy equivalent higher training intensities increased the rate of responders more effectively than continued moderate training intensities (P = 0.012). Conclusion High-intensity interval training increases the rate of response in VO2max to endurance training even when the total energy expenditure is held constant. Maintaining moderate endurance training intensities might not be the best choice to optimize training gains. Trial Registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00031445, Registered 08 March 2023—Retrospectively registered, https://www.drks.de/DRKS00031445

Cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory effects of high-intensity interval training in body fat responders and non-responders

“…Individualization of training intervention by load optimization, despite the target (sports results or health), is an effective way to achieve goals 19 , 39 , 64 . Training modifications are needed when progression is not visible, though appropriate increases must be introduced 65 . From a practical point of view, addressing the training intervention on an individual level is challenging when targeted at a population.…”

Effects on cardiorespiratory fitness of moderate-intensity training vs. energy-matched training with increasing intensity

“…The study procedures were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Association of Saarland (identification number 219/19). This data set was also used in a different research approach to analyze the training effects at the individual level by comparing the response rate between groups ( 23 ).…”