2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does high-dose vitamin D supplementation impact insulin resistance and risk of development of diabetes in patients with pre-diabetes? A double-blind randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
53
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight trials that have reported data on the effect of vitamin D supplementation and incident diabetes included persons with prediabetes ( 12–19 ). Five of these trials have major limitations, including a small sample size (109–205 participants) ( 12–15 , 18 ), not being designed for incident diabetes as the primary outcome ( 12 , 14 , 15 , 18 ), a short duration (≤1 year) ( 12 , 14 , 15 , 18 ), and open-label study design ( 13 , 15 ). Therefore, results from these 5 trials ( 12–15 , 18 ) and the 2 large trials where incident diabetes was a post-hoc outcome ( 38 , 39 ) are not informative in our understanding of the role of vitamin D supplementation for diabetes prevention in the clinical setting.…”
Section: Review Strategy and Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight trials that have reported data on the effect of vitamin D supplementation and incident diabetes included persons with prediabetes ( 12–19 ). Five of these trials have major limitations, including a small sample size (109–205 participants) ( 12–15 , 18 ), not being designed for incident diabetes as the primary outcome ( 12 , 14 , 15 , 18 ), a short duration (≤1 year) ( 12 , 14 , 15 , 18 ), and open-label study design ( 13 , 15 ). Therefore, results from these 5 trials ( 12–15 , 18 ) and the 2 large trials where incident diabetes was a post-hoc outcome ( 38 , 39 ) are not informative in our understanding of the role of vitamin D supplementation for diabetes prevention in the clinical setting.…”
Section: Review Strategy and Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine of 17 studies which investigated various dietary supplements used vitamin D as the intervention [ 36 , 37 , 42 , 68 , 69 , 83 , 91 , 92 , 94 ]. Most showed an increase in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels but failed to demonstrate improvements in FPG, insulin sensitivity, insulin resistance and lipid status.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most showed an increase in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels but failed to demonstrate improvements in FPG, insulin sensitivity, insulin resistance and lipid status. Results for rates of progression to T2DM [ 36 , 91 ] and β-cell function [ 42 , 69 , 92 ] in the vitamin D group were particularly confounding, as contradicting outcomes were reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventional trials also have conflicting results. Two recent prospective studies showed improvement in glucose metabolism after vitamin D supplementation was applied [67,68]. Unfortunately, the studies did not evaluate patients with renal disease.…”
Section: Vd and Diabetes Mellitusmentioning
confidence: 99%