2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00322.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Governance Matter? Yes, No or Maybe: Some Evidence from Developing Asia

Abstract: SUMMARY This paper seeks to explore the relationship between economic growth and governance performance in Asian developing economies. This exploration yields some interesting conclusions. First, notwithstanding its tremendous economic achievements, the state of governance in Asia is not stellar by international comparison. Indeed, the majority of these countries seem to suffer from a governance deficit. Second, contrary to our expectations, data do not suggest any strong positive link between governance and g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
3
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
46
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the preceding argument Quibria (2006) found that for Asian countries economic growth has been fastest in countries with low governance indicators. The inconsistency may be due to the different measures of governance used.…”
Section: Globalization Peace and Stability Governance And Kecontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Contrary to the preceding argument Quibria (2006) found that for Asian countries economic growth has been fastest in countries with low governance indicators. The inconsistency may be due to the different measures of governance used.…”
Section: Globalization Peace and Stability Governance And Kecontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…First, good governance has a positive relationship with per capita real GDP (Quibria, 2006), which implies that it influences trade enhancing factor, GDP, of source and destination countries. Second, ineffectiveness of domestic institutions to secure and enforce property rights in economic exchange increases trade costs by impacting adversely on risk perceptions and preferences in international transactions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 6 has the results of all cross section fixed effects which measuring the country differences from regional estimates. Here we are considering regional estimate as benchmark category and comparing cross section fixed effects to measure the status of governance for the countries of South Asia, This governance status is better than the estimation of Kaufmann (2004); Quibria (2006) in a way that it based on more robust econometric estimation than to get the governance status from cross section data of single year. Any county which negative estimates implies that particular governance indicator of that country has little impact on growth than regional level.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%