2001
DOI: 10.1006/brln.2001.2483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Global Context Modulate Cerebral Asymmetries? A Review and New Evidence on Word Imageability Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Take, for example, the pair of derived nouns in our study, xisun 'vaccination' and xósen 'robustness'. Both are equally short (consisting of only two syllables in speech and four letters in written Hebrew), but the second is more abstract than the first, which has a higher frequency and is the more 'imageable' of the two [39].…”
Section: Derived Nounsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Take, for example, the pair of derived nouns in our study, xisun 'vaccination' and xósen 'robustness'. Both are equally short (consisting of only two syllables in speech and four letters in written Hebrew), but the second is more abstract than the first, which has a higher frequency and is the more 'imageable' of the two [39].…”
Section: Derived Nounsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of abstractness of derived nouns is not uniform, but graded, and depends on factors like frequency, degree of lexicalization, the count/noncount distinction and imageability. The notion of 'imageability', similar but not identical to concreteness, refers to the ease with which a word gives rise to a sensory mental image and has been shown to have an effect on language processing [39][40][41][42][43]. High-imagery words, mostly concrete words [e.g., (wrist) watch], are easier to process than low-imagery words, mostly abstract words (e.g., time).…”
Section: Derived Nounsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have reported patterns that match the predictions of dual coding, showing bilateral processing of concrete words but LH-dominant processing of abstract words (Binder et al, 2005; Eviatar et al, 1990; Sabsevitz et al, 2005). Other studies, however, observed increased LH activity (Fiebach and Friederici, 2003) and LH processing advantages (see review in Chiarello et al, 2001) for concrete words, or enhanced activations for abstract words bilaterally (Pexman et al 2007) or selective to the LH (Noppeney and Price, 2004) or RH (Kiehl et al, 1999). …”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Prior studies showed that words were better identified in the right visual field than in the left visual field (Bouma, 1973; Bryden, 1970; Chiarello et al., 2001; Ellis, 2004; Simola et al., 2009). In the present study, the accuracies of T1 and T2 in transposed words were nearly identical in the left and right visual fields, whereas the identification accuracy of canonical words in the right visual field was statistically higher than that in the left visual field, signaling the presence of a right visual field superiority (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%