2016
DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20160209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does gastric resection volume influence sleeve gastrectomy results? a prospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another central factor being discussed as a predictor of both postoperative complications and weight loss results after LSG is the GRV. Although its impact has been widely discussed, the results are mainly discordant, thus fueling an ongoing debate [16][17][18][19]27]. Here, a recent prospective study suggested that GRV is impacting the outcomes subsequent to LSG during short-term and midterm follow-up while at the same time predicting the weight loss results in terms of percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) and control of obesityrelated metabolic complications [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another central factor being discussed as a predictor of both postoperative complications and weight loss results after LSG is the GRV. Although its impact has been widely discussed, the results are mainly discordant, thus fueling an ongoing debate [16][17][18][19]27]. Here, a recent prospective study suggested that GRV is impacting the outcomes subsequent to LSG during short-term and midterm follow-up while at the same time predicting the weight loss results in terms of percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) and control of obesityrelated metabolic complications [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a larger gastric remnant volume could be responsible for lower weight loss after LSG, and nevertheless, the gastric resected volume (GRV) is strictly related to the residual volume [16]. Even though some authors strictly exclude possible impact of GRV on weight loss after LSG [17,18], a recent prospective study by Sista et al demonstrated that the GRV is affecting outcomes after LSG, therefore being a predictive factor for weight loss and reduction of comorbidity [19]. Recently, a prospective study by Kim et al could associate preoperative stomach volume assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography with visceral fat volume and BMI, thus pointing out towards a more tailored therapeutic approach in bariatric surgery based on preoperative variables [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant differences in the results of LSG for RGV>1200 ml were showed in the literature [ 4 , 5 , 13 ]. Other authors have also shown that very high or low RGV cut-off do not determine significant differences between the samples [ 13 , 15 ]. Weiner and al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study we used a RGV of 1500 ml as a cut-off to compare the results of LSG: we have chosen experimentally a cut off 1500 ml with a minimum RGV of 1100 ml for Group A because several studies [ 4 , 13 ] show that the average range of RGV is between 900 ml and 1400 ml with a median of Gaussian distribution around 1100 ml and other authors have described HRGV values above 1500–1800 ml [ 13 , 15 ]. The Authors believe that, although arbitrary, an RGV>1500 defines well a High Gastric Resection Volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion there are neither certain data which evidence a correlation between obesity and GCT, nor data to support the hypothesis of a higher incidence of GCT after bariatric surgery. Based on our experience in obese patients [19,20], the finding of neuroendocrine tumors in the pre-operatory phase is not a contraindication for bariatric surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%