Does foreign private investment affect the clean industrial environment? Nexus among foreign private investment, CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade openness, and sustainable economic growth

Ge, Mina; Kannaiah, Desti; Li, Junrong; Khan, Nasir Abbas; Shabbir, Malik Shahzad; Bilal, Kashif; Tabash, Mosab I.

doi:10.1007/s11356-022-18814-x

Cited by 54 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This study uses second-generation cointegration technique to examine the cointegrating relationship between the represented variables in table 5. Frontiers in Environmental Science frontiersin.org (Nathaniel et al, 2020;Alola et al, 2019;Anser et al, 2021;Arslan et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2022;Dai et al, 2022;Ge et al, 2022;Jun et al, 2021;Khan et al, 2021;Khuong et al, 2021;Arif et al, 2020;Shabbir 2020;Sharma et al, 2021;among others). table 6 explains the decision on base of FMOLS and DOLS models.…”

Section: Test Of Cointegrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dynamic relationship among technological innovation, international trade, and energy production

Zhang

Jain

Qian

et al. 2023

Front. Environ. Sci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The primary objective of this study is to analyze the dynamic association among the green energy production (GEP), green technological innovation (GTI), and green international trade (GIT). This study uses fully modified least square (FMOLS) and dynamic least square (DOLS) for data analysis. This study uses the panel data set starts from 2000 to 2020 for eight south Asian countries. This study find a negative relationship between GEP and EFP. However, green technological innovation and green international trade have positive significant association. This study recommends several policy implications regarding the economies of south Asia (SA) based on empirical findings: to subsidize the industries for the installation of renewable projects for the production of renewable energies.

show abstract

Section: Test Of Cointegrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The dynamic relationship among technological innovation, international trade, and energy production

Zhang

Jain

Qian

et al. 2023

Front. Environ. Sci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Trade openness and investment are significant contributors to sustainable inclusive growth in all income cases and there is not much variation in terms of their significance (Sohag et al, 2015;Farooq et al, 2019;Campbell and Sigalov, 2022;Ge et al, 2022). Trade creates opportunities for countries to mutually grow and benefit from the fruits of economic growth.…”

Section: Empirical Findings and Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The debate on inclusive growth was triggered by the World Bank and its partners for a focus on sustainability of inclusive growth, particularly in the late 2000's. The drive for sustainable economic growth is occurring at the same time as demands for better standards of living, and an issue of poverty reduction in many developing countries (Midilli et al, 2006;Jackson., 2009;Fay., 2012;Yip et al, 2016;Romano et al, 2017;Alola et al, 2021;Sachs, et al, 2021a;Dantas et al, 2021;Kirikkaleli and Adebayo., 2021;Nundy et al, 2021;Sachs et al, 2021;Ge et al, 2022). However, despite much research on achieving sustainable inclusive growth, many countries still suffer from high-income inequalities, widespread poverty, and high unemployment levels, which is not measured while taking care of economic growth measures such GDP alone (Nguyen, 2021a;Roberts et al, 2021;Hassan et al, 2022;Inam and Murat., 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Green Energy Consumption and Inclusive Growth: A Comprehensive Analysis of Multi-Country Study

Ghouse

Aslam

Bhatti³

2022

Front. Energy Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Whenever there is a question of environmental quality and inclusive economic growth, green and renewable energy consumption leads the debate. This paper explores the relationship between green energy consumption and inclusive economic growth. It employs GMM panel data modelling frameworks for understanding the “green energy vis-à-vis -growth paradox”. It uses post-COVID-19 data for eighty-three countries between 2010 and 2020. These countries are divided into high-, middle- and low-income as per the World Bank’s classifications. The selected composite variables are consisting of GDP growth, poverty, income equality and employment measures. The study reports that green energy positively contributes to inclusive growth despite its lower contribution to overall energy usage in low-income countries. It observes that socio-digital inclusion and green energy together impact positively on inclusive growth in all income groups (low, middle and high). This means citizens of the selected countries are aware of the pros and cons of green energy that helps countries to mitigate the negative impacts of countries’ transition to clean energy usage in terms of job losses, higher costs of clean energy and uncertainty to energy supply. Furthermore, results also reveal that green energy is significant contributor towards achieving inclusive growth, however it his highly significant in high income countries compared to other groups, showing its higher use in it. This comprehensive study is the first of its kind providing comparative analysis of 83 countries which explores and compares the interesting impacts of green energy consumption on inclusive growth in global data from the designated income groups.

show abstract

“…The results indicate that green creativity and green mindfulness have positive effect on clean environment. Cao et al (2022) explain the relationship among financial development, energy consumption, and sustainable environmental-economic growth through sustainable environmental agenda in the era of globalization, whereas Ge et al (2022) examine the causal effect of foreign private investment on clean industrial environment through CO 2 emissions, energy consumption, trade openness, and sustainable economic growth. investigate the impact of green environmental innovation really matter for carbon-free economy through green technological innovation, green international trade, and green power generation.…”

Section: Environment and Organizational Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

The role of technological innovation, strategy, firms performance, and firms size and their aggregate impact on organizational structure

Jiang

Ashiq

et al. 2022

Manage Decis Econ

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigates how numerous contingencies work together to influence the organizational structure of privately held businesses in China. This study is using a cross-section primary data set from 83 private firms listed in China. The data are gathered by face-to-face interviews with entrepreneurs, and six hypotheses tests are performed regarding the contingencies of organizational form. Furthermore, the empirical findings indicate that environment, strategy, size, and technology play a significant role in explaining organizational form. Finally, financial factors are important aspects of the business environment, notably in dealing with cash flow problems and in forming profit expectations.

show abstract

Does foreign private investment affect the clean industrial environment? Nexus among foreign private investment, CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade openness, and sustainable economic growth

Cited by 54 publications

References 37 publications

The dynamic relationship among technological innovation, international trade, and energy production

The dynamic relationship among technological innovation, international trade, and energy production

Green Energy Consumption and Inclusive Growth: A Comprehensive Analysis of Multi-Country Study

The role of technological innovation, strategy, firms performance, and firms size and their aggregate impact on organizational structure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About