2001
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.257081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Foreign Ownership Matter? Russian Experience

Abstract: The paper both compares productivity of Russian firms that have foreign direct investments with productivity of fully domestically owned firms and analyses spillovers from foreign-owned firms to domestic firms. Foreign firms are found to be more productive than domestic ones, but productivity of the former is negatively affected by slow progress of reforms in the regions where they operate. It is also found that there are positive spillovers from foreign-owned firms to domestic firms in the same industry, but … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These spillover effects of knowledge transfer (technology, management, and expertise) are the main reasons for their positive influence of exporting and foreign ownership on firm growth. Studies from TEs such as Russia support views that foreign ownership has a positive effect on firm performance (Djankov and Murrell 2002;Yudaeva et al 2003). Foreign ownership contributes to import of advanced technologies, training, and vertical technology transfers through diffusing technology, and more importantly, for developing countries capital investment (Taymaz and Özler 2007) and TEs (Hashi and Krasniqi 2011).…”
Section: Managerial Capacities Strategy and Growth Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These spillover effects of knowledge transfer (technology, management, and expertise) are the main reasons for their positive influence of exporting and foreign ownership on firm growth. Studies from TEs such as Russia support views that foreign ownership has a positive effect on firm performance (Djankov and Murrell 2002;Yudaeva et al 2003). Foreign ownership contributes to import of advanced technologies, training, and vertical technology transfers through diffusing technology, and more importantly, for developing countries capital investment (Taymaz and Özler 2007) and TEs (Hashi and Krasniqi 2011).…”
Section: Managerial Capacities Strategy and Growth Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, these positive effects are not consistently found in developing countries and tend to be negative in Central and Eastern European Countries. Djankov and Hoekman (2000) find negative spillovers in the Czech Republic, Yudaeva et al (2003) report positive horizontal but negative vertical spillovers in Russia, while Konings (2001) finds negative spillovers to domestic firms in Bulgaria and Romania, but no spillover effects in Poland. Girma et al (2001) report no evidence for spillovers on average but instead, they find evidence for spillovers to firms with a low technology gap with MNEs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only very recently research on intersectoral externalities has emerged (Barrios and Strobl, 2002;Schoors and van der Tol, 2002;Damijan et al, 2003;Yudaeva et al, 2003;Kugler, 2005). Measurement difficulties seem to be the main reason for this scarce attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%