Does fish growth respond to fishing restrictions within Marine Protected Areas? A case study of the striped red mullet in the south‐west Adriatic Sea (central Mediterranean)

Abstract

1. Some of the factors that influence fish growth are intrinsic (e.g. genetic and physiological), while others are environmentally driven (e.g. temperature, food availability). Growth, therefore, has biological but also ecological implications, as it is influenced by the environment in terms of energy flow.2. In this study, the growth patterns of the striped red mullet, Mullus surmuletus, inside the buffer zone of the Marine Protected Area (MPA) of Torre Guaceto and in two locations (Monopoli and Molfetta) outside the MPA were investigated in the south Adriatic Sea (central Mediterranean).3. The growth parameters for the female population fraction were estimated using the otolith back-calculation technique: predicted asymptotic length (infinity) (TL ∞ ) = 313.781 mm, growth coefficient (K) = 0.236 year À1 and prenatal length (t 0 ) = À1.255 year for Molfetta; TL ∞ = 342.988 mm, K = 0.173 year À1 and t 0 = À1.828 year for Monopoli; TL ∞ = 404.394 mm, K = 0.199 year À1 and t 0 = À1.037 year for Torre Guaceto MPA. The results showed a significantly higher growth rate of female specimens of M. surmuletus, particularly 2 years and older, obtained from inside the MPA compared to those taken at the two outside locations.4. These findings suggest that fishing restrictions in the buffer zone of the MPA (where fish are more abundant and bigger) could be a more powerful driver for boosting individual fish growth than the mere 'density effect', which would have suggested lower growth rates associated with higher population densities.

On the biology of blackbellied angler, Lophius budegassa Spinola, 1807, in the north-western Mediterranean

“…In some cases, it may be related to technical factors such as the hard structure chosen to study the age/growth in a given species, the size range (Coggins et al, 2013), the preparation methods (Smith et al, 2016;Carbonara et al, 2020), the age criteria used (Hüssy et al, 2016;, and/or the experience of the readers . Moreover, the geographical differences of the environmental conditions (Bellodi et al, 2022), together with different degrees of fishing pressure (Schindler et al, 2000;Carbonara et al, 2022), commonly represent an additional source of variation in growth characteristics.…”