2017
DOI: 10.14260/jemds/2017/333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Fasting and Postprandial Blood Sampling for Thyroid Evaluation Make a Difference in Children?

Abstract: BACKGROUND Thyroid function tests are one of the commonly undertaken investigations in any paediatric outpatient department. Based on the existing literature, there are no standard guidelines in respect of the sampling procedure to be followed in infants and children. Every paediatrician is aware of the logistic problems in taking a fasting sample in infants and younger children unlike adults. In this context, it was planned to undertake a pilot study to identify if the timing of sampling, fasting or postprand… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies in the literature [6,7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] have shown that satiety causes a decrease in TSH in general, but this effect isn't seen in children [18]. In our study, the lowering effect of satiety on TSH was observed in all normal, subclinical hypothyroid and hypothyroid groups as in previous studies [6,14,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies in the literature [6,7,[10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] have shown that satiety causes a decrease in TSH in general, but this effect isn't seen in children [18]. In our study, the lowering effect of satiety on TSH was observed in all normal, subclinical hypothyroid and hypothyroid groups as in previous studies [6,14,15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In many studies [6,11,[14][15][16]18], there was no significant effect of satiety on fT4 level while in our study it was determined that satiety can increase fT4 level only in the control group. But even this effect has small effect size.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%