2012
DOI: 10.1177/0149206312463936
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Family Involvement Influence Firm Performance? Exploring the Mediating Effects of Board Processes and Tasks

Abstract: Following calls to capture the consequences of family involvement in the business, this article empirically investigates the mediating role of board processes (i.e., effort norms, use of knowledge and skills, and cognitive conflicts) and board (control and strategy) tasks in the relationship between family involvement and firm performance in small and medium-sized companies. To address this purpose, we developed a theoretical model using family business and corporate governance literature. We collected data fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
197
1
28

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(241 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(329 reference statements)
5
197
1
28
Order By: Relevance
“…We focus on the importance of boards in this relationship, given that entrepreneurial success in family businesses is largely determined by the ideas contributed by board directors (Miller and Le Breton-Miller 2006). Boards' contributions depend, however, on their level of diversity (Hillman and Dalziel, 2003;Maseda et al 2015) and strategic involvement (Machold et al 2011) because they give advice on various strategy issues, from formulation to outcomes (Zahra et al 2009), that may compensate for the managerial shortcomings from which many family SMEs suffer (Zattoni et al 2015). Hence, we focus on the potential moderating impact on this relationship of two main diversity factors, family involvement and female involvement, in boards with different strategic involvement levels.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Development Eo-firm Pementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We focus on the importance of boards in this relationship, given that entrepreneurial success in family businesses is largely determined by the ideas contributed by board directors (Miller and Le Breton-Miller 2006). Boards' contributions depend, however, on their level of diversity (Hillman and Dalziel, 2003;Maseda et al 2015) and strategic involvement (Machold et al 2011) because they give advice on various strategy issues, from formulation to outcomes (Zahra et al 2009), that may compensate for the managerial shortcomings from which many family SMEs suffer (Zattoni et al 2015). Hence, we focus on the potential moderating impact on this relationship of two main diversity factors, family involvement and female involvement, in boards with different strategic involvement levels.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Development Eo-firm Pementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boards of directors represent the highest decision making level and play various roles related to strategic processes (Zattoni et al 2015). The literature on the role of boards of directors depicts boards as a source of competitiveness and an essential contributor to firm value creation (Pugliese et al 2009).…”
Section: Boards Of Directors In Family Smesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study adapted the two-stage approach of assessing the measurement model before the structural model, which has been widely accepted in prior studies (e.g., Medsker, Williams, & Holahan 1994;Zattoni, Gnan, & Huse 2012). Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) (i.e., principal axis factoring with Oblique factor rotation) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were first conducted to examine the reliability, validity, and goodness of fit for the measurement model.…”
Section: Overview Of the Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But consideration was given to a potential nested model with a direct path from Financial Literacy to Growth Asset Allocation (as evidenced in Gallery et al 2011a;Sachse et al 2012 (Zattoni et al 2012). …”
Section: Comparison With Other Nested Structural Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%