Does facial soft tissue protect against zygomatic fractures? Results of a finite element analysis

Abstract

IntroductionZygomatic fractures form a major entity in craniomaxillofacial traumatology. Few studies have dealt with biomechanical basics and none with the role of the facial soft tissues. Therefore this study should investigate, whether facial soft tissue plays a protecting role in lateral midfacial trauma.MethodsA head-to-head encounter was simulated by way of finite element analysis. In two scenarios this impact - with and without soft tissues - was investigated to demonstrate the potential protective effects. To achieve realism, a transient simulation was chosen, which considers temporal dynamics and realistic material parameters derived from CT grey values.ResultsThe simulation results presented a typical zygomatic fracture with all relevant fracture lines. Including soft tissues did not change the maximum bony stress pattern, but increased the time period from impact to maximal stresses by 1.3 msec.ConclusionsAlthough this could have clinical implications, facial soft tissues may be disregarded in biomechanical simulations of the lateral midface, if only the bony structures are to be investigated. Soft tissue seems to act as a temporal buffer only.

Comparative finite element analysis of skull mechanical properties following parietal bone graft harvesting in adults

“…The potential role of soft tissues (scalp, brain, meninges, cerebro-spinal liquid) on the overall mechanical behavior of the skull was not taken into account in our models. Despite a possible dampening effect in case of an impact on the skull, this soft tissue effect is unlikely to differ significantly from one model to the next (Huempfner-Hierl et al, 2015).…”

An assessment of the role of the falx cerebri and tentorium cerebelli in the cranium of the cat ( Felis silvestris catus )

“…The same applies to the PDL (E ¼ 50 MPa; n ¼ 0.49) which was taken from Rees and Jacobsen [18]. A 0.5 MPa value was assigned to the remaining generic soft tissues [19], including the brain endocast, link elements and filling materials (n ¼ 0.45).…”

A computerized facial approximation method for archaic humans based on dense facial soft tissue thickness depths

“…We extracted stable regions with robust normal estimation from the whole skull and then used FSTDs of the vertices within these stable regions to accomplish FA. It comprised two steps: firstly, we calculated the FSTDs of all the vertices along the closest distance vectors (Huempfner-Hierl et al 2015). For every vertex of the template skull, the nearest point on the template face was searched, and the FSTDs were defined as the Euclidean distances between every pair of corresponding vertices.…”