2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3568134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does European Union Really Matter for Long-Run Growth and Development? In Search of the Missing Counterfactual

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported and somewhat positive effect of being an EU member on growth appears to be robust across more than 10,000 randomly generated donor samples. Somewhat intriguingly, they find that Greece is the only exception to the positive effects since its likely growth trajectory without EU membership appears to be better than the actual growth trajectory with the EU membership, although no clear consensus has been reached in the literature (Garoupa & Spruk, 2020).…”
Section: Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reported and somewhat positive effect of being an EU member on growth appears to be robust across more than 10,000 randomly generated donor samples. Somewhat intriguingly, they find that Greece is the only exception to the positive effects since its likely growth trajectory without EU membership appears to be better than the actual growth trajectory with the EU membership, although no clear consensus has been reached in the literature (Garoupa & Spruk, 2020).…”
Section: Prior Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…One such example relates to membership of the European Union and the effect of the institutional bonus of the EU-wide institutional framework on within-country economic growth. To isolate the effect of EU membership on growth, Campos et al (2019) and Garoupa and Spruk (2020) set up the synthetic control designed to include only one treated country and several non-treated ones. This implies that a single EU country is used in the treatment sample whilst the control samples include only non-EU units to capture the effect of EU membership on the economic growth trajectory.…”
Section: Treatment Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…al. 2019, Garoupa and Spruk 2020, Maseland and Spruk 2020. One such example is the membership of the European Union and the effect of the institutional bonus of the EUwide institutional framework on within-country economic growth.…”
Section: Treatment Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. (2019) and Garoupa and Spruk (2020) free-trade zone on a range of economic outcomes. These results are further confirmed once the social impact of the free-trade zone is considered (Castilho et.…”
Section: Treatment Scopementioning
confidence: 99%