Does environmentally biased technological progress reduce air pollution emissions? empirical analysis based on spatial model and PSTR model

Abstract

Environmental policies and Environmentally biased technological advances have important theoretical value and practical significance for air pollution reduction and green economic development in China. The article is based on panel data for 270 cities in China from 2007 to 2020. Using a Spatial model, the direct, spillover and moderating effects of Environmentally biased technological progress on “local-neighbourhood” urban air pollution are examined empirically. On this basis, the PSTR model is used to further explore the non-linear effects of different types of environmental regulations. The study found that: 1) There is a significant positive spatial correlation between both air pollution and Environmentally biased technological progress in China. Environmentally biased technological progress significantly suppresses air pollution, with significant spatial spillover effects, and the conclusions remain robust after a series of robustness tests. 2) Different types of environmental regulations reinforce the dampening effect of Environmentally biased technological progress on air pollution. However, informal environmental regulation only reinforces the dampening effect of Environmentally biased technological progress on air pollution in the local cities. 3) There is a significant threshold effect of environmental regulation on the impact of Environmentally biased technological progress on air pollution. When the level of environmental regulation within a certain threshold interval, Environmentally biased technological progress has a dampening effect on air pollution. 4) The more eastern the city, the larger the city and the non-resource-based cities, the more significant the air pollution suppression effect of Environmentally biased technological advances. Based on this, this study points out that governments at all levels should pay attention to the spatial spillover effect of technological progress bias on air pollution, deepen the construction of joint prevention and control mechanisms for regional air pollution control; Establish multiple environmental regulation policies, formulate and implement environmental regulation policies according to local conditions and local technological progress bias; Formulate targeted environmental regulation policies and technological innovation policies according to the characteristics of different cities. It is an important theoretical reference to help China to fight the battle against air pollution in-depth and to promote further improvement of ecological and environmental quality.

The Impact and Mechanism of the Digital Economy on Carbon Emission Efficiency: A Perspective Based on Provincial Panel Data in China

“…Within this work, we explored the geographical clustering status of the model's explanatory and explained variables through Moran's I and utilized it to assess the spatial autocorrelation of the variables, drawing on the study of Meng et al (2022) [63]. As shown in Table 6, for the observation period of 2011-2019, the observed values of DE and RCEE were positive, and both could reject the null hypothesis of no spatial connection at the 1% level of significance (except for RCEE in 2018).…”

Can China’s Campaign-Style Environmental Regulation Improve the Green Total Factor Productivity?

“…According to Liu et al [30], the technological progress of China's manufacturing industry is biased, and environmental regulation has a significant threshold effect on technological progress. Meng et al [31] argue that environmental regulation and environmentally friendly technological progress have important implications for reducing air pollution and green economic development in China, and that environmental regulation can strengthen technological progress in favor of environmental development. Zhou et al [32] analyzed the impact of different types of environmental regulations on technological progress biases, and concluded that government-regulated environmental regulations promote technological progress in energy conservation and emission reduction, and market-based environmental regulations promote technological progress in energy conservation, but that informal environmental regulation can only accelerate the technical progress of environmental protection.…”