Does environmental heterogeneity affect the productive efficiency of grid utilities in China?

Abstract

China's electricity industry has experienced a reform whereby the generation sector is being opened up to competition but the transmission and distribution sectors are still regulated. Efficiency and benchmarking analyses are widely used for improving the performance of regulated segments, and the impact on efficiency of observable environmental factors, together with unobservable characteristics, has gained increasing attention in recent years. This study uses alternative stochastic frontier models combined with input distance functions to study the productive efficiency of 29 grid firms of China over the period 1993-2014 and investigates the effect of observed environmental factors and unobserved heterogeneity. The results indicate that efficiency is sensitive to model specification and illustrates the presence of observed and unobserved heterogeneity. The number of customers, power delivered and network length are demonstrated to have positive impacts on the utilities' efficiency while adverse environmental conditions harm the operation of grid utilities, but policy regulations may offset the negative impact. Finally, we suggest that there is room for efficiency improvement in the distribution grid, which could be encouraged by incentive regulation, even taking due account of environmental heterogeneity. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics Faculty of Economics www.eprg.group.cam.ac.uk Does environmental heterogeneity affect the productive efficiency of grid utilities in China? EPRG Working Paper 1820

The scale effect in China's power grid sector from the perspective of malmquist total factor productivity analysis

“…Power grid companies in these regions perform better in network design and utility construction, and they have more predetermined mechanisms to offset the adverse impacts of bad weather. Second, a negative coefficient appears for the temperature range, which coincides with the finding by Liu et al (2019). The positive impact of temperature range on efficiency is mainly related to the special design of grids.…”

“…Kumbhakar et al (2015) split the firm-specific term into unobserved heterogeneity and time-invariant inefficiency, while technical inefficiency is decomposed into persistent and transient terms in later studies (Filippini and Greene, 2016). Among the observable heterogeneities, weather (Liu et al, 2019) and economic factors (Deng et al, 2018) are commonly considered when estimating technical efficiency, while customer density and customer structure (Çelen, 2013b), firm ownership (Boylan, 2016), and a dummy variable for reform (Xie et al, 2020) are mainly incorporated when studying service efficiency.…”

Does directed technological change favor energy? Firm-level evidence from Portugal

“…The distance function approach is preferable when researchers are more interested in technical e¢ ciency, and it allows more than one type of output, desirable or undesirable, resulting from the production process. Duman and Kasman (2018) investigate production e¢ ciency with GDP and CO 2 emission as two outputs produced with capital, labor and energy; Boyd and Lee (2019) analyze the e¢ ciency in the utilization of electricity and fuel in …ve metal-based manufacturing industries in the US; Liu et al (2019) study whether the technical e¢ ciency of grid utilities in China is a¤ected by environmental heterogeneity. The production function approach is more commonly applied in research on directed technological change.…”

“…Generally, SFA studies consider several functional forms depending on their purposes. The distance function deals with multiple outputs and is usually applied to assess the determinants of technical ine¢ ciency (Boyd and Lee, 2019;Liu et al, 2019). The cost function focuses on …rms' ability to optimize their costs.…”

Directed technological change, energy and more: a modern story

“…Two approaches are most frequently applied: the distance function approach and the production function approach. The distance function approach allows us to analyze the technical efficiency in a production procedure that involves multiple outputs; recent applications in energy economics include Boyd and Lee (2019) and Liu et al (2019), among others. The production function approach, on the other hand, facilitates the calculation of a set of indicators for technological change.…”