Does Employment-Related Migration Reduce Poverty in India?

Abstract

Using the unit data from the 64th round of the National Sample Surveys, 2007-08 on employment, unemployment, and migration, covering 125,578 households, this paper estimates the level, depth, and severity of poverty among nonmigrants and intra-state migrants, inter-state migrants, and emigrants in India. Based on the out-migration of any members of the household for employment at place of origin and using place of last residence definition, households are classified into intrastate migrants, inter-state migrant, emigrants, and non-migrant households. Economic well-being of migrant's households at the place of origin is measured by consumption expenditure (income). A set of poverty indices, the poverty headcount ratio, poverty gap ratio, and square poverty gap, are estimated from the household consumption expenditure to measure the level, depth, and severity of poverty among migration categories.indices. Descriptive analyses and logistic regression analyses are used in the analyses. Results suggest that the level, depth, and severity of poverty among migrant households is lower than that among non-migrant households; however, it varies across migrant categories. The poverty head count ratio was 41 % among inter-state migrants, 31 % among intra-state migrants, 20 % among emigrants, and 39 % among non-migrants in India. The poverty gap ratio and squared poverty gap were highest among inter-state migrants. Two broad patterns emerge from the state level analyses. Barring Kerala and Punjab that have a higher percentage of emigrants, inter-state migration accounts for a larger share of employment-related migration from the less developed states of Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, and Odisha while intra-state migration accounts for a larger share in the developed states of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu. Second, the level, depth, and severity of inter-state migrants from less developed states is higher than that of intra-state migrants and non-migrants; however, the pattern is reversed in the more developed states of India. Adjusting for socioeconomic correlates, the odds of poor among intra-state migrants are lower than those among inter-state migrant's households. The study supports the proposition that migration and remittances in India are not panacea to structural development constraints and that poor long-distance migrants need to be integrated in poverty alleviation programs.

Migrant Workers for the Development of Industrial Zones in Bac Ninh Province, Vietnam

“…Many studies have shown that labor migration positively affects the well-being of displaced households (Fukase, 2013;Ngoma & Ismail, 2013;Sikder & Ballis, 2013;Zeitlyn et al, 2014). Similarly, Mohanty, Mohapatra et al (2015) who demonstrated that the level, depth, and severity of poverty among migrant households was lower than those among non-migrant households. Migrants who migrated out had higher income per capital and better education in comparison with non-migrants (Vakulabharanam & Thakurata, 2014).…”

Counting the Invisible Working Hands in India

“…Most of the destination states regard the migrants as vagrants and perceive migration as a threat to their stability and social order. The access to PDS (Public Distribution System), health care, housing, immunization, and schooling are generally not made available to the migrant family at times, the migrants themselves refrain from obtaining the resident status in the destination states to retain their links with the place of departure or state of origin (Mohanty et al 2016). Therefore, for the purpose accounting the duration of work for interstate migrants the period up to which a migrant laborer works in the destination States by retaining his or her residency in the place of departure or the state of origin can be counted.…”

The Integration of Interstate Migrants in India: A 7 State Policy Evaluation

“…Therefore, there is an urgent need to foster migrant integration in the popular destination states of India (Sridhar et al, 2012; Mohanty et al, 2016). Interstate migrants need integration measures such as access to poverty alleviation/employment guarantee schemes (Mohanty et al, 2016).…”

“…Internal migration in developing countries is a crucial livelihood strategy for low‐income households and communities and it has positive changes in both sending and receiving areas (Deshingkar and Grimm, 2005; McKenzie and Yang, 2010; Mohanty et al, 2016; Srivastava and Sutradhar, 2016; Nayyar and Kim, 2018). Despite this, internal migration continues to be viewed as a destabilising process by policy makers and they do not acknowledge the beneficial effect that it has on development (Nyberg‐Sørensen et al, 2002; Deshingkar and Grimm, 2005; Kundu and Sarangi, 2007; Geiger and Pécoud, 2013; Bhavnani and Lacina, 2015).…”