2010
DOI: 10.1002/jps.21996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does electrostatic charge affect powder aerosolisation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the surfaces of the resultant particles did not show the typical finger-like nano-scale crystals on SD or SFD pure mannitol particles [44,45]. Rather, the SD particles produced in the current study appeared to have a wrinkled coating while the SFD particles were composed of porous, folded sheets.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…However, the surfaces of the resultant particles did not show the typical finger-like nano-scale crystals on SD or SFD pure mannitol particles [44,45]. Rather, the SD particles produced in the current study appeared to have a wrinkled coating while the SFD particles were composed of porous, folded sheets.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In contrast to this Adi et al (2010) came to the conclusion that the aerosolisation of a powder is not affected by electrostatic charge. They charged mannitol powder to different magnitudes of charge by tumbling it inside containers of different materials and then dispersed it from an Aerolizer s .…”
Section: Relative Humiditymentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Since micron-sized material tends to self-agglomerate, to minimize variability in agglomerate size, mannitol was subjected to Turbula mixing (Bachofen AG Maschinenfabrik, Basel, Switzerland) in a cylindrical aluminium container (25 mm diameter×36 mm length) at 42 rpm for 15 min using conditions reported previously (24). After mixing, the primary agglomerates were passed through a nest of sieves (ISO 3310-1 test sieves, Endecotts Ltd., London, UK) to produce a 500 μm-800 μm sieve fraction.…”
Section: Preparation Of a Model Particulate Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%