Does electronic case-processing enhance court efficacy? New quantitative evidence

Castelliano, Caio; Grajzl, Peter; Watanabe, Eduardo

doi:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101861

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Contemplating the issue of timely judicial proceedings, researchers present various perspectives on the optimal resolution of this problem in their studies. C. Castelliano et al (2023) substantiate the effectiveness of electronic case hearings in the Brazilian judiciary, arguing that the introduction of electronic courts increases productivity, reduces processing time, and enhances speed, thus unequivocally contributing to the efficiency of courts across different jurisdictions. A similar position was expressed by other scientists.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Untitled

2024

Ûridičnij Časopis Nacìonalʹnoï Akademìï Vnutrìšnìh Sprav

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Редакційна колегіяГоловний редактор С. Чернявський доктор юридичних наук, професор, Національна академія внутрішніх справ, Україна Члени редакційної колегії доктор юридичних наук, професор (голова редколегії), Національна академія внутрішніх справ, Україна доктор юридичних наук, професор, Науково-дослідний інститут приватного права і підприємництва імені академіка Ф. Г. Бурчака НАПрН України, Україна доктор юридичних наук, професор, Національна академія внутрішніх справ, Україна доктор юридичних наук, професор, Національна академія внутрішніх справ, Україна доктор юридичних наук, доцент, Національна академія внутрішніх справ, Україна доктор юридичних наук, професор, Національна академія внутрішніх справ, Україна доктор юридичних наук, професор, Казахський національний педагогічний університет імені Абая, Республіка Казахстан доктор габілітований в галузі права, Краківська академія імені Анджея Фрича Моджевського, Республіка Польща доктор юридичних наук, професор, Казахський національний педагогічний університет імені Абая, Республіка Казахстан доктор філософії в галузі права, професор, Ризька вища школа права, Латвійська Республіка доктор габілітований в галузі права, Університет Козьмінського, Республіка Польща доктор габілітований в галузі права, професор, Кельнський університет, Федеративна Республіка Німеччина доктор юридичних наук, професор, Потсдамський університет, Федеративна Республіка Німеччина доктор габілітований в галузі права, професор, Опольський університет, Республіка Польща

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 98%

Untitled

2024

Ûridičnij Časopis Nacìonalʹnoï Akademìï Vnutrìšnìh Sprav

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The information system furnishes a structure that facilitates the effective administration of judicial review case data. 72 Data protection and confidentiality are critical in digital endeavors, including the judicial review case proceeding before the Constitutional Court. The Constitutional Court adheres to the principles of transparency and accessibility in its approach to case law.…”

Section: Rules and Principles For Accelerating Digital Transformation...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalization of Legal Transformation on Judicial Review in the Constitutional Court

Setiawan,

Ketut Rachmi Handayani,

Hamzah

et al. 2024

JHCLS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Efficient, affordable, and uncomplicated justice poses a complex dilemma within the Indonesian judicial system. However, applying technological advancements to assessing legal regulations can resolve this issue. This research aims to examine the necessity and implementation of digitalization in the Constitutional Court's judicial review process. This research utilized a normative legal approach, characterized by its prescriptive and applied nature, to examine the development and implementation of digitalization in the justice systems of the European Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom through comparative studies. The research results show that: first, technology in the Constitutional Court's judicial review process can most effectively promote openness and clarity in the decision-making procedure. However, there remain several areas in which the Constitutional Court must further refine itself to attain digital status, as inconsistencies persist in its practical rulings. Consequently, the Constitutional Court must increase the rate of digital transformation in its judicial review operations. Second, numerous other nations, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States, have observed the implementation of technological advancements, leading to enhanced transparency and accessibility in their justice systems. Thirdly, to overcome the challenges above, we must apply the fundamental principles of good judicial governance, procedural law at the Constitutional Court, the paperless principle, and the contactless service principle when developing digital transformation for future judicial review at the Court. This will enable us to achieve transparency and accessibility in the Constitutional Court's judicial system.

show abstract

Efficiency analysis using SBM and PLS-SEM: insights from the Italian judicial system

Mazzocchi,

Quintano,

Rocca

2024

Qual Quant

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent governmental concerns regarding the persistent long duration of judicial proceedings have drawn attention to efficiency issues in this sector. This paper provides insights into the Italian scenario, investigating potential relationships between Italian judicial efficiency and several latent constructs identified as relatively more significant than others. For this purpose, a two-step procedure was used, considering data envelopment analysis (DEA), precisely the slacks-based measure (SBM), and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Beyond ranking courts according to their technical efficiency, findings reveal that judicial efficiency has significant relationships with performance, quality and context features. At the same time, results do not show evidence to support a relationship with proceeding features. What emerges from the work is that the analysis of heterogeneity seems to offer relevant evaluation leverage, and significant differences appear among Italian courts. These insights and the model provided would represent a useful analysis tool for specific policy assessments, supporting the evaluation of regulatory measures and structural reforms relevant to judicial administration.

show abstract

Does electronic case-processing enhance court efficacy? New quantitative evidence

Cited by 4 publications

References 51 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Digitalization of Legal Transformation on Judicial Review in the Constitutional Court

Efficiency analysis using SBM and PLS-SEM: insights from the Italian judicial system

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About