2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does early decompression improve neurological outcome of spinal cord injured patients? Appraisal of the literature using a meta-analytical approach

Abstract: Study design: Definitive and unequivocal evidence to support the practice of early or late surgery is still lacking in clinical studies. Accordingly, meta-analysis is one of the few methods that offer a rational, statistical approach to management decision. A review of the clinical literature on spinal cord injury with emphasis on the role of early surgical decompression and a meta-analysis of results was performed. Objectives: To determine whether neurological outcome is improved in traumatic spinal cordinjur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
117
1
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(100 reference statements)
6
117
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, patients of this study with a pronounced spinal canal encroachment did have a significantly higher risk of neurological deficits and confirmed by a majority of relevant literature [25,55,61,81]. Experimental [17,24,77] and clinical studies [19,27,49,68] substantiated that a rapid surgical decompression and spinal canal clearance from bony fragments in patients with incomplete neurological deficits renders beneficial results with a better outcome [12,40,55].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Nevertheless, patients of this study with a pronounced spinal canal encroachment did have a significantly higher risk of neurological deficits and confirmed by a majority of relevant literature [25,55,61,81]. Experimental [17,24,77] and clinical studies [19,27,49,68] substantiated that a rapid surgical decompression and spinal canal clearance from bony fragments in patients with incomplete neurological deficits renders beneficial results with a better outcome [12,40,55].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…CSCI traumatic cervical spinal cord injury without major fracture or dislocation, HV healthy volunteers Compared with CSCI and HV * P \ 0.05, ** P \ 0.01, *** P \ 0.001 compression at the injured segment [18][19][20][21]. La Rosa and colleagues [19], in particular, reported that early decompression surgery within 24 h of trauma had a significantly better outcome, compared with late surgical management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…La Rosa and colleagues [19], in particular, reported that early decompression surgery within 24 h of trauma had a significantly better outcome, compared with late surgical management. On the other hand, Kawano and colleagues [22] reported that surgical treatment was not found to be superior to conservative treatment for traumatic CSCI without major fracture or dislocation with spinal cord compression in the acute phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, extrapolation of these results to the human clinical situation is doubtful since in patients surgical decompression is rarely preformed within several hours, the injury is never standardized and there is no diagnostic means to determine the exact type and severity of the neurologic injury. Nevertheless, several LOE I and II clinical studies support these findings in patients with spinal cord injury [17,18,28,35,39,55] and reviews recommend early surgery in spinal cord injury [2,16,36,41,44]. But there are also articles that report no difference in neurological outcome between early and late decompression [22,42,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%