2021
DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2021.105594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does dual-energy abdominal computed tomography increase the radiation dose to patients: a prospective observational study

Abstract: The aim of our study was to compare single-energy (SECT) and dual-energy (DECT) abdominal computed tomography (CT) examinations in matched patient cohorts regarding the differences in effective radiation dose (ERD) and image quality performed in a third-generation dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) scanner. Material and methods:Our study included 100 patients, who were divided randomly into 2 groups. The patients included in Group A were scanned by SECT, and Group B members were scanned by DECT. Volume CT … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dual-energy computed tomography is a reliable method for quantifying the degree of fat infiltration in bones and muscles, 17,18,28 but its biggest drawback is the use of ionizing radiation. With the development of several generations of DECT technology, the radiation dose has significantly reduced, 29 and the volume CT dose index of patients in this study was even lower than that of single-source CT abdominal scanning 30 . Also, opportunistic examinations were possible because OP evaluations were performed at the same time as the lumbar spine scans, which reduced the radiation dose specifically for bone densitometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Dual-energy computed tomography is a reliable method for quantifying the degree of fat infiltration in bones and muscles, 17,18,28 but its biggest drawback is the use of ionizing radiation. With the development of several generations of DECT technology, the radiation dose has significantly reduced, 29 and the volume CT dose index of patients in this study was even lower than that of single-source CT abdominal scanning 30 . Also, opportunistic examinations were possible because OP evaluations were performed at the same time as the lumbar spine scans, which reduced the radiation dose specifically for bone densitometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The biggest disadvantage of DECT, compared to MRI, is the presence of ionizing radiation. The radiation dose is now significantly reduced with the development of several generations of DECT technology [ 31 ]. In this study, the radiation dose received by each patient for DECT scanning was about 4.6 mSv, which was a lower dose level, equivalent to twice the annual background radiation dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%