2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Drug-Eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Improve the Management of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma? A Meta-Analysis

Abstract: BackgroundDrug eluting beads (DEB) are relatively new embolic agents that allow sustained release of chemotherapeutic agents in a localized fashion to the tumor. This technique is associated with reduced systemic side effects relative to systemic chemotherapy and an increase in the dose of antineoplastic agent delivered to the lesion. The meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of DEB-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the management of hepatocellular cancer.MethodsWe searched … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Han et al[34] performed a meta-analysis of three RCTs and two case-control studies. Their meta-analysis included DC Beads TACE and cTACE groups comprising 217 and 237 patients, respectively.…”
Section: Response To DC Beads Tacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al[34] performed a meta-analysis of three RCTs and two case-control studies. Their meta-analysis included DC Beads TACE and cTACE groups comprising 217 and 237 patients, respectively.…”
Section: Response To DC Beads Tacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a few studies [20][21][22][23] suggested that the two modalities were equally effective and safe. Meta-analyses to select a better TACE yielded different results [24][25][26][27][28]. We performed this meta-analysis for the following reasons:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because these studies were not designed for equivalence, there is no level 1 evidence that DEB-TACE has an equivalent efficacy to c-TACE in terms of tumor response or survival. In addition, two meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing DEB-TACE and c-TACE have been recently published [40,41] and were unable to demonstrate any significant difference in the tumor response rate or in the complications rate obtained with both procedures. A more recent meta-analyses, showed that DEB-TACE provided significantly better tumor response and improved 1-and 2-year survival compared with c-TACE.…”
Section: Delivery Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%