2019
DOI: 10.1111/kykl.12217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Diversity Undermine the Welfare State? Evidence from the Provision of Local Public Services in European Regions

Abstract: SUMMARY The management of the welfare state in a heterogeneous society is a growing challenge in Europe. This paper investigates the relationship between diversity and the welfare state by studying the citizens’ satisfaction about public services across European regions; it also establishes a link between research on diversity and the welfare state, and fiscal federalism theory, by focusing on the provision of local public services. We employ region level indicators of the citizens’ perception of local public … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are aligned with the social capital literature advocating the tendency of individuals to group with whom they perceive they share similar values and social norms (Cassar et al, 2007). Beyond the microfinance context, empirical works seem to confirm this perspective suggesting that socio‐economic diversity within a well restricted spatial proximity, might, to some extent, humper prosociality as fragmented groups are less prone to collective actions (Alesina & La Ferrara, 2005; Filippetti, 2020).…”
Section: Analysis and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings are aligned with the social capital literature advocating the tendency of individuals to group with whom they perceive they share similar values and social norms (Cassar et al, 2007). Beyond the microfinance context, empirical works seem to confirm this perspective suggesting that socio‐economic diversity within a well restricted spatial proximity, might, to some extent, humper prosociality as fragmented groups are less prone to collective actions (Alesina & La Ferrara, 2005; Filippetti, 2020).…”
Section: Analysis and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anomalies have been found between the fiscal independence index calculated by BPK and macroeconomic conditions, such as the regions of East Java and Central Java, although they are fiscally independent and economic growth is above 5 percent, poverty and open unemployment rates (Daitoh & Tarui, 2022) are quite high. This reflects that the implementation of regional autonomy (Ansolabehere & Puy, 2022;Filippetti, 2020) has not been able to encourage regional fiscal independence, which has implications for improving the macroeconomic conditions of a region. The policy of fiscal decentralization (Bojanic, 2018) reduces the fiscal space and intervention of the central government so that there are obstacles to increasing economic growth, which has implications for reducing poverty and unemployment on a national scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This shows that quality of life is a key channel through which boosting institutional compliance and conformity. For instance, recent studies stress on the effect that political decentralisation and regional autonomy may have on citizens subjective well‐being and citizens' satisfaction (Diaz‐Serrano & Rodríguez‐Pose, 2012; Filippetti, 2020). Our results suggest that the impact of these policy interventions can be further analysed with respect to institutional conformity and law compliance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%