2022
DOI: 10.1186/s42466-022-00212-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does diabetes mellitus affect the safety profile of valproic acid for the treatment of status epilepticus? A retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Background In the treatment of status epilepticus less is known about the influence of comorbidities on the safety profile of anticonvulsive drugs. Especially patients with diabetes mellitus may be predisposed to certain adverse events that have been related to therapy with valproic acid. In this single-center retrospective cohort study we examined if the complications of the intravenous treatment with valproic acid is different in patients with or without diabetes. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gasparini et al highlighted an association between the number of ASMs taken at the last hospitalization and the recurrence of SE [ 15 ]. In our study, ASMs that could be administered intravenously were clearly the most commonly used, with levetiracetam as the main drug administered, followed by valproate and lacosamide [ 42 , 43 ]. Pharmacological treatment in the context of recurrent SE episodes should be more thoroughly investigated in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gasparini et al highlighted an association between the number of ASMs taken at the last hospitalization and the recurrence of SE [ 15 ]. In our study, ASMs that could be administered intravenously were clearly the most commonly used, with levetiracetam as the main drug administered, followed by valproate and lacosamide [ 42 , 43 ]. Pharmacological treatment in the context of recurrent SE episodes should be more thoroughly investigated in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%