2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the real world, politicians do not speak so carefully; they often push only one side of the debate and make the desired comparisons explicit in their messaging campaigns. It has been suggested that this deliberate dimension of metaphorical discourse may be important for how people respond to a particular message, resulting in greater influence and persuasion (e.g., Steen, ; but see Gibbs, ). Therefore, it is possible that a more ecologically valid statement that explicitly compares the President to the manager of a household budget and highlights the importance of this mapping would result in a stronger effect of the message frame, especially for those who are predisposed to resonate with or value this metaphorical comparison (i.e., right‐leaning voters).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the real world, politicians do not speak so carefully; they often push only one side of the debate and make the desired comparisons explicit in their messaging campaigns. It has been suggested that this deliberate dimension of metaphorical discourse may be important for how people respond to a particular message, resulting in greater influence and persuasion (e.g., Steen, ; but see Gibbs, ). Therefore, it is possible that a more ecologically valid statement that explicitly compares the President to the manager of a household budget and highlights the importance of this mapping would result in a stronger effect of the message frame, especially for those who are predisposed to resonate with or value this metaphorical comparison (i.e., right‐leaning voters).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tanto opositores (Gibbs, 2015;Gibbs & Chen, 2017) como el mismo Steen (2017) han reconocido como debilidad de la tmd el carecer de estudios empíricos y experimentales que sustenten sus postulados. En respuesta a esto se ha señalado que se trata de una teoría de formulación precisa reciente en cuanto a sus supuestos (Steen, 2017).…”
Section: Aplicaciones De La Teoría De La Metáfora Deliberadaunclassified
“…As a developing theoretical framework, DMT is in need of research that empirically investigates the distinction between deliberate and non-deliberate metaphor (Gibbs, 2015a;Steen, 2017). To the best of our knowledge, little empirical work has been done on the cognitive processing of deliberate versus non-deliberate metaphors (see Gibbs, 2015b;Krennmayr, Bowdle, Mulder, & Steen, 2014). There is, however, a body of work using ERP or behavioral methods which suggests that metaphors are processed differently as compared to nonmetaphorical language.…”
Section: (Deliberate) Metaphor Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%