2020
DOI: 10.1364/oe.382319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does deep learning always outperform simple linear regression in optical imaging?

Abstract: Deep learning has been extensively applied in many optical imaging problems in recent years. Despite the success, the limitations and drawbacks of deep learning in optical imaging have been seldom investigated. In this work, we show that conventional linear-regression-based methods can outperform the previously proposed deep learning approaches for two black-box optical imaging problems in some extent. Deep learning demonstrates its weakness especially when the number of training samples is small. The advantag… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the Cobb angle can be estimated independent of recording conditions such as illumination of a room or human skin color. A DLA trained and tested for a certain category of samples may not work when it is generalized to different test samples [21]. In fact, the accuracy of the DLA by Yang et al [15] was lower in the external data set than in the internal data set and the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic decreased from 0.95 to 0.81 when detecting scoliosis with a curve ≥10˚ [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the Cobb angle can be estimated independent of recording conditions such as illumination of a room or human skin color. A DLA trained and tested for a certain category of samples may not work when it is generalized to different test samples [21]. In fact, the accuracy of the DLA by Yang et al [15] was lower in the external data set than in the internal data set and the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic decreased from 0.95 to 0.81 when detecting scoliosis with a curve ≥10˚ [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear Regression: If there is a linear relationship between the predicted data and the variables in the study, linear regression is preferred [37]. Linear Regression curve and the representation of the data are given in Figure 6.…”
Section: Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrate that using DL it is possible to correctly classify two neuroblastoma cell lines with an accuracy of 100%. It is important to underline that the comparison among different learning strategies allows to identify a trade-off between the classification accuracy and the computational complexity of the selected learning method [30]. The paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%