Does Decentralization Facilitate Access to Poverty-Related Services? Evidence from Benin

Abstract

We study the effect of decentralization on the access to some poverty-related public services in Benin. Compiling panel data from local governments' accounts and from surveys on 18,000 Beninese households performed in 2006 and 2007, our study suggests that decentralization has a positive overall effect on access to basic services. However, this effect appears to be nonmonotone following an inverted U-shaped curve. It varies according to local jurisdictions' wealth and to the nature of basic services. Decentralization in Benin contributes positively to the reduction of poverty by improving the average access to poverty-related services. However, the devil is in the details, as decentralization seems to increase inequality among local governments in terms of access. Another result relying on the success of decentralization in Benin is the prioritization of basic services, which differs among local governments according to their wealth. While the poorest jurisdictions neglect primary education, focusing more on access to drinking water, the richest ones get less attention to sewage services, since these are already provided at a sufficiently high level.

Food Systems in Africa: Rethinking the Role of Markets

“…However, such research is limited to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. Studies of decentralization and public finance examine how decentralization influences public services delivery (Caldeira and Rota-Graziosi 2014;Caldeira, Rota-Graziosi, and Foucault 2012), but these studies barely, if at all, cover commercial infrastructure services, particularly because local authorities rarely consider such infrastructure a public service.…”

“…Studies of Sub-Saharan Africa remain rare-see Raton (2012) for an example of a geographical economics approach to Mali. Studies of decentralization and public finance examine how decentralization influences public services delivery (Caldeira and Rota-Graziosi 2014;Caldeira, Rota-Graziosi, and Foucault 2012), but these studies barely, if at all, cover commercial infrastructure services, particularly because local authorities rarely consider such infrastructure a public service and often manage it in partnership with the private sector. Other areas of inquiry that call for analysis and study include political economies, infrastructure management modes, community relations, merchant associations, private sector actors, tax collection methods, and the influence of these areas on efficiency .…”

Dynamics of Local Government Finance in Cameroon: An Assessment of Local Councils in the Fako Division

“…Hence, much frustration with the results of centralized economic policy has been articulated. Reformers also shifted to decentralization to reduce central government control and encourage broader participation in democratic governance [30]. Local councils are more accessible to the population and will easily recognize the interests of communities and thus provide the required quality of public services.…”

Distributional Effects of Intergovernmental Transfers in Mexico

“…The empirical evidence on the effects of decentralization on poverty and inequality is mixed. Some studies suggest that the informational gains of decentralization can have a positive impact on pro-poor spending and targeting (Alderman 2002; Bardhan and Mookherjee 2005;Galasso and Ravallion 2005), while others show that, by enhancing access to basic services, decentralization can contribute to poverty reduction (Caldeira, Foucault, and Rota-Graziosi 2016). Decentralization may not lead to poverty eradication in locations where there is substantial corruption, limited local checks and balances, a lack of political commitment and policy coherence, and insufficient capacity (Steiner 2005).…”