2014
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.2843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does CRISPR-Cas open new possibilities for patents or present a moral maze?

Abstract: NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although current data seem to indicate that these are not a major obstacle, a better characterization of Cas9 cleavage is required before the technology is used in humans. Ethical considerations are a second outstanding issue (124). The possibility of modifying the germline-in particular the human germline-should be weighed carefully.…”
Section: Sequence-specific Antimicrobialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although current data seem to indicate that these are not a major obstacle, a better characterization of Cas9 cleavage is required before the technology is used in humans. Ethical considerations are a second outstanding issue (124). The possibility of modifying the germline-in particular the human germline-should be weighed carefully.…”
Section: Sequence-specific Antimicrobialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CRISPR/Cas9 technology has also been adapted to generate mutant miRNA binding sites (Bassett et al, 2014) and its interference platform (CRISPRi) imparts a complementary approach to RNAi (Larson et al, 2013; Qi et al, 2013; Kumar and Jain, 2015). CRISPR/Cas9 mediated gene editing technology opens a door to human therapeutic applications by generating synthetic proteins translated from or independent of artificial genes associated with transgenic plants (Webber, 2014).…”
Section: Insights On Crispr/cas9 Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2015 ). Webber noted an emerging legal debate surrounding the patentability of CRISPR-Cas modified genes (Webber 2014 ). Finally, Pollack and Lander examined the clinical ethics of this technology and cited concerns over the safety, cost–benefit analysis, possible applications in eugenics, and moral grayness inherent to genetic modification of human life (Lander 2015 ; Pollack 2015 ).…”
Section: Crispr-cas Germline Editing Raises Ethical Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%