2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2010.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does consanguinity lead to decreased incidence of breast cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the difference between the two groups is not statistically significant (p>0.001), suggesting that inbreeding may have a small protective effect against breast cancer that could have been detected with a larger study sample. This finding is similar to the result of previous population-based studies conducted in women with breast cancer (Denic et al, 2001;Bener et al, 2010) showing that the parental consanguinity was more frequent in women without breast cancer than in those with cancer, and that the coefficient of inbreeding was lower in breast cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the difference between the two groups is not statistically significant (p>0.001), suggesting that inbreeding may have a small protective effect against breast cancer that could have been detected with a larger study sample. This finding is similar to the result of previous population-based studies conducted in women with breast cancer (Denic et al, 2001;Bener et al, 2010) showing that the parental consanguinity was more frequent in women without breast cancer than in those with cancer, and that the coefficient of inbreeding was lower in breast cancer patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In fact, consanguinity which increases the chances of homozygosity, was linked to an increased risk of breast RESEARCH ARTICLE cancer by many authors (Simpson et al, 1981;Shami et al, 1991;Rudan et al, 1999;Liede et al, 2002;Denic et al, 2003;Denic et al, 2007). However, studies conducted in other populations have shown that consanguinity does not affect, or may be protective for breast cancer risk (Denic et al, 2001;Denix et al, 2005;Bener et al, 2010). This suggests that the effect of inbreeding on cancer risk may differ for different tumours, for the same tumour and may vary between populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROPN1L was a potential novel candidate identified in a GWA study for breast cancer susceptibility (Sehrawat et al, 2011), which suggested that BMI and cancer might share genetic components. Interestingly, the family history of breast cancer and BMI are highly associated with breast cancer (Bener et al, 2010). In addition, it has been shown that BMI, obesity and cancer may share genetic components (Brennan et al, 2009;Lewis et al, 2010;Lurie et al, 2011;Tang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Consanguinity might be also an equivocal risk-modifying factor [21,22]. Indeed, the Lebanese population has a relatively high rate of consanguinity (around 15–20 %), and association studies on consanguinity and breast cancer, and the frequency of BRCA 1 and BRCA2 in highly consanguineous populations pointed that consanguinity might lead to decreased incidence of breast cancer [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%