2018
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/tcrhq
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Compliance Pay? Social Standards and Firm-level Trade

Abstract: for helpful feedback on this study. We wish to thank Sharlene Song for excellent research assistance and the MIT Sloan School of Management Dean's Innovation Fund for providing travel and research support.

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Oka (2010a, 2010b) finds that a reputation‐sensitive buyer is important for factory compliance, and there may also be additional effects here on the probability of survival. Reputation‐sensitive buyers may support their factories with higher prices in exchange for improvements in working conditions that might improve the reputation of the buyers, as found by Distelhorst and Locke (2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Oka (2010a, 2010b) finds that a reputation‐sensitive buyer is important for factory compliance, and there may also be additional effects here on the probability of survival. Reputation‐sensitive buyers may support their factories with higher prices in exchange for improvements in working conditions that might improve the reputation of the buyers, as found by Distelhorst and Locke (2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…More recently, socially compliant Chinese firms have been found to have lower productivity and profits (Distelhorst, 2020). According to this strand of evidence, firm benefits from social compliance may be limited to access to export markets and increased orders from and higher prices paid by reputation‐sensitive and socially conscious international buyers (Distelhorst & Locke, 2018; Oka, 2010a, 2010b). The evidence that factories are more likely to improve compliance performance if they fear public disclosure of noncompliance (Ang et al, 2012; Robertson, 2020) further suggests that factories are motivated to comply for reasons related to reputation rather than for the impact that compliance might have on the internal operations of the firm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Malesky and Mosley (2018) offered survey evidence showing that Vietnamese exporters report higher willingness to invest in labor compliance in order to do business with importers that provide higher price markups. Distelhorst and Locke (2018) found that exporters across 36 countries were, on average, rewarded by increased purchasing when they improved compliance with labor and environmental standards. Oka (2012) showed that compliance with certain labor standards, such as health and safety, enabled factories in Cambodia to secure long-term sourcing relationships with reputation-conscious buyers.…”
Section: Compliance-promoting Incentives In Trading Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using data from a large sourcing company, Distelhorst and Locke () find that suppliers that improve their performance on labor and environmental audits do subsequently receive larger orders. On the other hand, looking closely at one retailer with a reputation for social responsibility, Amengual et al (forthcoming) find that improvements were not generally rewarded with larger orders.…”
Section: Organizational Power At a Distancementioning
confidence: 99%