2013
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does comorbidity interact with colorectal cancer to increase mortality? A nationwide population-based cohort study

Abstract: Background:It is unknown whether comorbidity interacts with colorectal cancer (CRC) to increase the rate of mortality beyond that explained by the independent effects of CRC and comorbid conditions.Methods:We conducted a cohort study (1995–2010) of all Danish CRC patients (n=56 963), and five times as many persons from the general population (n=271 670) matched by age, gender, and specific comorbidities. To analyse comorbidity, we used the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. We estimated standardised mort… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
37
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing age and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score) were both noted to have a negative impact on overall survival, which would be an expected finding and is in keeping with several studies in the literature [18,19]. Patients from a moderately deprived socioeconomic background (as per IMD classification) were noted to have a significantly worse survival than those with low deprivation but this trend did not hold for the most deprived cohort of patients, although there was a relatively small number of patients in this category (624/192 706, 0.3%) and a type II statistical error may have been present.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Increasing age and increasing comorbidity (Charlson score) were both noted to have a negative impact on overall survival, which would be an expected finding and is in keeping with several studies in the literature [18,19]. Patients from a moderately deprived socioeconomic background (as per IMD classification) were noted to have a significantly worse survival than those with low deprivation but this trend did not hold for the most deprived cohort of patients, although there was a relatively small number of patients in this category (624/192 706, 0.3%) and a type II statistical error may have been present.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Reasons for this differential impact of comorbidity are unclear and call for further investigation into whether comorbidities affect therapeutic response at specific tumor sites or affect tumor biology, as results from a study suggested that comorbidities could accelerate CRC progression. 34 Evidence showing that rightsided CRC has poorer tumor features could also play a role, 35 as our data showed pronounced impact of comorbidity in tumor stages and sites with good prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, a stronger interaction was observed with colorectal cancer than with prostate and breast cancer [21,22]. Survival of colorectal cancer patients is lower than that of breast and prostate cancer patients, and treatment is usually more invasive, which may increase colorectal cancer-related mortality [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%