2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2021.103484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does coaching, mentoring, and supervision matter for pre-service teachers’ planning skills and clarity of instruction? A meta-analysis of (quasi-)experimental studies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0
8

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
4
40
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been confirmed that coaching and training support the competencies of the PSTs required for their job [65][66][67]. According to the meta-analysis of Kraft et al [68], Mok and Staub [28] and the literature review of Hoffman et al [69] summarize the effectiveness of coaching practices for teachers' pedagogical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been confirmed that coaching and training support the competencies of the PSTs required for their job [65][66][67]. According to the meta-analysis of Kraft et al [68], Mok and Staub [28] and the literature review of Hoffman et al [69] summarize the effectiveness of coaching practices for teachers' pedagogical outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In addition to the above concerns, teacher education programs must be revised to improve teacher skills, advance teacher visions, and promote teacher actions that meet societies' demands for excellent, professional teachers. With that said, little is known about the benefits of training and coaching PSTs across the various dimensions or the degree to which such training and coaching contributes to creating professional teachers who are prepared to enter the teaching workforce [28][29][30]. This is especially true regarding a PST's ability to incorporate online tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mentoring is a social activity involving interactions between the mentor and the mentee (Ambrosetti et al, 2014). It is an essential component of the teaching practicum because it supports student teachers in learning about teaching, putting knowledge obtained from teacher education into perspective, and improving their teaching ability (Mena et al, 2017;Mok and Staub, 2021). The notion of mentoring is often used interchangeably with coaching and supervising (Ambrosetti et al, 2014); however, they are somewhat different in their focuses.…”
Section: The Impact Of Mentoring On Student-teacher Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mentoring relationships can be positive or negative (Izadinia, 2015). Prior research has extensively documented the positive side of mentoring (e.g., Johnson, 2003;Lindgren, 2005;Hobson et al, 2009;Richter et al, 2013;Orland-Barak, 2014;Mok and Staub, 2021). In Germany, for example, Richter et al (2013) pointed out that positive mentoring relationships fostered teacher efficacy, teaching enthusiasm, and job satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decades, research into teaching practicum (hereafter TP) during initial teacher education has been prolific, as can be seen from various studies that have focused on reviews of the literature to synthesize the topic (Lawson et al, 2015;Mok & Staub, 2021;Nesje & Lejonberg, 2022;Ongrsquo & Jwan, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%