2011
DOI: 10.1890/es11-00147.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does climate affect pollen morphology? Optimal size and shape of pollen grains under various desiccation intensity

Abstract: Abstract. Seed production is likely constrained by pollen limitation and the viability of pollen grains decreases rapidly in time due to water evaporation. Any decrease in the surface-to-volume ratio, through increase in size or change in shape of a grain, reduces the rate of water loss. However, grain size trade-offs with the number of grains that can be produced by a plant. Here, we tested the hypothesis that under higher desiccation stress pollen grains become larger and more spherical. We analyzed data on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
54
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
54
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, we propose that due to the size variability in Cedrus atlantica pollen, and lack of evidence for climatic influence, it would not be possible to use this as a proxy for climate or environmental reconstruction, as differences in the size of fossil pollen may simply result from the observed natural variation in size between pollen grains. Our findings contrast the suggested climatic influence on grain size observed in other species (Ejsmond et al 2011(Ejsmond et al 2015Griener & Warny 2015), and underscore the need for further investigation of the complex controls on pollen grain size .…”
contrasting
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, we propose that due to the size variability in Cedrus atlantica pollen, and lack of evidence for climatic influence, it would not be possible to use this as a proxy for climate or environmental reconstruction, as differences in the size of fossil pollen may simply result from the observed natural variation in size between pollen grains. Our findings contrast the suggested climatic influence on grain size observed in other species (Ejsmond et al 2011(Ejsmond et al 2015Griener & Warny 2015), and underscore the need for further investigation of the complex controls on pollen grain size .…”
contrasting
confidence: 95%
“…It has also been hypothesised that the size and shape of the pollen grain itself may be influenced by climate (Ejsmond et al 2011). Temperature has been previously linked to pollen grain size (Kurtz &Liverman 1958), andSchoch-Bodmer (1936) proposed that grain size variability in pollen is a result of fluctuations in moisture availability in ambient air during pollen development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surface-to-volume ratio is one of the major traits that determine the rate of water loss, which in turn translates to viability and chances of successful pollination (Aylor 2003;Ejsmond et al 2011). Thus, larger grains should have an advantage over smaller ones when desiccation intensity increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, larger grains should have an advantage over smaller ones when desiccation intensity increases. Indeed, as long as we assume that desiccation is the major force determining the viability of pollen grains, we can expect that the optimal strategy for a plant flowering under high desiccation intensity is to produce small numbers of relatively large pollen grains (Ejsmond et al 2011). Such a tendency has been confirmed by the intraspecific analysis of pollen size of eight species of Rosaceae according to which plants flowering in conditions with high temperatures and high potential evapotranspiration (PET) produced significantly larger pollen grains than conspecifics growing at sites with lower temperatures and lower PET (Ejsmond et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%