1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1052.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does circumcision influence sexually transmitted diseases?: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1
3

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
28
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no clear evidence that circumcision prevents sexually transmitted diseases. The only consistent trend is that uncircumcised men are more susceptible to genital ulcer disease, while circumcised men are more prone to urethritis [14]. Recently, there have been reports on the possible correlation between HIV infection and circumcision status [15±17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no clear evidence that circumcision prevents sexually transmitted diseases. The only consistent trend is that uncircumcised men are more susceptible to genital ulcer disease, while circumcised men are more prone to urethritis [14]. Recently, there have been reports on the possible correlation between HIV infection and circumcision status [15±17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By removing this source of Langerhans cells, circumcision could potentially reduce the risk of HIV/AIDS acquisition and transmission. [25][26][27] The prepuce may be susceptible to mild trauma during intercourse, facilitating transmission of infection, 28 whereas the warm and moist environment under the prepuce is also thought to be conducive to prolonged viral survival. 27,28 Finally, the layer of keratin that develops in a circumcised penis may provide additional defense against infection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 The immunological effects of subpreputial fl ora, secretory immunoglobulins, and lytic secretions from the prostate, urethra, and seminal residues are unclear. 28 Finally, the prepuce may reduce the likelihood of abrasions occurring during intercourse, thereby removing a potential site for viruses to enter the body. 28 The evidence did not show a decrease in sexual satisfaction and function after circumcision.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma revisão mais recente confirma o risco aumentado de sífilis e cancróide, mas não de outras IST nos incircuncisos. 42 O prepúcio também é um sitio favorável à aderên-cia bacteriana e está associado a um maior risco de infecções urinárias em crianças. 30 De acordo com uma meta-análise de nove estudos (três prospectivos e seis retrospectivos) sobre a associação entre circuncisão e infecções urinárias pediátricas, 30 o risco relativo de infecção urinária em crianças incircuncisas foi calculado em 12,0 (IC 95%: 10,6-13,6).…”
Section: O Prepúcio E As Origens Da Circuncisão Masculinaunclassified