Does Changing a Light Bulb Lead to Changing the World? Political Action and the Conscious Consumer

Abstract

As the prevalence of “conscious” consumption has grown, questions have arisen about its relationship to political action. An influential argument holds that political consumption individualizes responsibility for environmental degradation and “crowds out” genuine forms of activism. While European and Canadian empirical research contradicts this perspective, finding that conscious consumption and political engagement are positively connected, no studies of this relationship have been conducted for the United States. This article presents ordinary least squares (OLS) regression models for two datasets, the 2004 General Social Survey and a detailed survey of approximately 2,200 conscious consumers conducted by the authors, to assess the nature of the relationship between conscious consumption and political activism. The authors find that measures of conscious consumption are significantly and positively related to political action, even when controlling for political involvement in the past. The results suggest that greater levels of political consumption are positively related to a range of political actions.

From plastic bottle recycling to policy support: An experimental test of pro-environmental spillover

“…Specifically, purchasing environmentally-friendly products has been shown to be positively related to support for wind power development and policies supporting social justice (Thøgersen & Noblet, 2012;Willis & Schor, 2012). Further, performance of low cost environmental behaviors were positively correlated with support for climate policies among a Swiss sample (Tobler, Visschers, & Siegrist, 2012).…”

Discourses about the meaning of the local food Investigations in Romanian urban contexts

“…In fact, empirical studies tend to show that the congruency between values and overt actions is rather a myth and consumer choices are limited also by macro-level constraints. Thus, it would be too naïve to put the accent on the consumers as drivers of social change and to expect that many individuals, added together, can change the world (Willis-Schor 2012).…”

Are we counting what counts? A closer look at environmental concern, pro-environmental behaviour, and carbon footprint

“…Assuming the actual impact of these behaviours to be overwhelmingly positive for the environment, some argue, is demonstrative of "naïve aggregationism", or the assumption that everyone doing a small part will add up to a big impact (Willis and Schor 2012). For instance, although framed as a hopeful finding, Dietz et al (2009) used a statistical model to predict if an average of 50% of individual households in the USA adopted 17 PEBs (over the course of 10 years), the USA would reduce its emissions by only 7.4%.…”