2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11149-022-09448-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does capital-based regulation affect bank pricing policy?

Abstract: This paper tests whether a series of changes to capital requirements transmitted to a change to banks’ pricing policy. We compile a rich bank-level supervisory dataset covering the banking sector in the Czech Republic over the period 2004–2019. We estimate that the changes to the overall capital requirements did not force banks to alter their pricing policy. The impact on bank interest margins and loan rates is found to lie in a narrow range around zero irrespective of loan category. Our estimates allow us to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Phi et al (2019) found no evidence that a more stringent capital regulation induces higher lending rates in the long run in the Vietnamese banking industry over the period 2008 to 2016. Similar results are reported by Ehrenbergerová, Hodula, and Gric (2022) who found that changes to the overall capital requirements in the Czech Republic did not force banks to alter their loan pricing. In contrast, Fischer et al (2012) found mixed results in their study on how margins on US‐syndicated loans changed when there was an adjustment in capital regulation: For the period 1988–1992 (a period when regulatory changes and market pressures forced banks to hold higher capital ratios), the authors found a negative relationship between capital ratio and loan rates.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Phi et al (2019) found no evidence that a more stringent capital regulation induces higher lending rates in the long run in the Vietnamese banking industry over the period 2008 to 2016. Similar results are reported by Ehrenbergerová, Hodula, and Gric (2022) who found that changes to the overall capital requirements in the Czech Republic did not force banks to alter their loan pricing. In contrast, Fischer et al (2012) found mixed results in their study on how margins on US‐syndicated loans changed when there was an adjustment in capital regulation: For the period 1988–1992 (a period when regulatory changes and market pressures forced banks to hold higher capital ratios), the authors found a negative relationship between capital ratio and loan rates.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Parameter β will also be less than one if banks have some degree of market power or if there are switching costs and/or asymmetric information costs (Bondt, 2005). The framework in Equation () can be augmented to also account for the pass‐through from capital‐based regulation in line with Ehrenbergerová, Hodula, and Gric (2022) by allowing for normalγ to have both, a constant ( γ0true) and a time‐varying constant ( γ2,normalttrue) component. Equation () can thus be re‐written as Brgoodbreak=()γ0goodbreak+γ2,normaltgoodbreak+βMPR0.25em …”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%