Does California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standards reduce carbon dioxide emissions?

Abstract

The Low Carbon Fuel Standards (LCFS) represents a new policy approach designed to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by applying standards to all stages of motor fuel production. We use the synthetic control and difference-in-differences econometric methods, and Lasso machine learning to analyze the effect of the LCFS on emissions in California’s transportation sector. The three different techniques provide robust evidence that the LCFS reduced carbon dioxide emissions in California’s transportation sector by around 10%. Furthermore, our calculations show that improved air quality, due to the application of the LCFS, may have benefited California in the magnitude of hundreds of millions of dollars through an increase in worker’s productivity.

Evaluating Signalization and Channelization Selections at Intersections Based on an Entropy Method

“…In addition to turning conflicts, some researchers have also studied the relationship between vehicle emissions and traffic delay in urban areas [ 36 , 37 ]. In China, a total of 56 large and medium-sized cities, including 17 provincial capitals, have adopted vehicle restriction policies due to traffic congestion, vehicle energy conservation and emission reduction, which covers the majority of developed cities in China.…”

Predicting the physical properties of three-component lignocellulose derived advanced biofuel blends using a design of experiments approach

“…Therefore, a global change to the fuel standards is required to enable the use of oxygenated fuels that could contribute towards the low-carbon fuel options for the decarbonisation targets to be more easily met. 81–83 In this study we have shown that the selected properties can be met by certain blends, but there are additional physical property limits that must be met for a fuel to be certified. These include oxidative stability, copper corrosion, and lubricity.…”

Machine learning for geographically differentiated climate change mitigation in urban areas

“…Only 1.5 % of the transport and building ML literature investigates policies (26 and 18 studies respectively). These include ex-post evaluation of fuel standard policies relying on statistical learning techniques (Huseynov & Palma, 2018), and the application of Bayesian networks to investigate how different financing mechanisms would affect willingness to retrofit (Bertone et al, 2018). For the uptake of improved technologies, policies are crucial to signal and incentivize shifts.…”