2015
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1008398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does calibration reduce variability in the assessment of accounting learning outcomes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ultimate goal is to align personal standards frameworks and academic standards within and across institutions with those expected by the discipline, professions, subject and accrediting bodies, employers, and the public (Sadler, 2011). Social calibration carries considerable weight with educational practitioners (O'Connell et al, 2016;Watty et al, 2013), even though it is at an early stage in development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ultimate goal is to align personal standards frameworks and academic standards within and across institutions with those expected by the discipline, professions, subject and accrediting bodies, employers, and the public (Sadler, 2011). Social calibration carries considerable weight with educational practitioners (O'Connell et al, 2016;Watty et al, 2013), even though it is at an early stage in development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entry qualification (Thornes 2012a;Bachan 2017) Age (Richardson & Woodley 2003) Gender (Bondi 1996;Smith 2007) Socio-economic background (Thiele et al 2016) School type (Bachan 2017) and/or geographical location (Singleton 2010;Gibbons & Vignoles 2012) ASSESSORS Assessment practices and standards (Healey 2010) Assessment methods (Knight 2006) Assessment standards (Price 2005;Bloxham 2009;Hudson et al., 2017) Marking criteria / procedures 2016a;Sadler 2014;Bloxham et al 2015) Moderation practices (Sadler 2013;O'Connell et al 2016) Classification mechanisms (Hefce 2015) F I G U R E 3 Explaining the variability of assessor standards in the context of departmental, institutional, and sector-wide attributes and influences (building on Chapman, 1993).…”
Section: Institutional Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Watty et al (2014) describe a calibration activity where a disciplinary community came together to discuss exemplars of students' work, compared their judgements and tried to reach consensus. There is increasing research on calibration as a way of establishing academic standards within a discipline (Watty et al 2014;O'Connell et al 2016). Chapter 6 discusses ways of bolstering marker reliability.…”
Section: Validity and Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to the recommendations of O'Connell et al, (2015), O'Connell et al, (2016 and Watty et al (2014) our schema in figure 1 shows how appropriate leadership outcomes can be developed by benchmarking external learning standards, in the case of Australia -AALS. As reflected upon earlier in the paper, through alignment of our learning outcomes and our activities and assessment practices with external accounting learning standards, we can provide evidence of meeting the demands of our stakeholders (Birrell & Betts, 2018;O'Connell et al, 2015).…”
Section: A Schema For the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%