2014
DOI: 10.1002/lary.24943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does body mass index predict tracheal airway size?

Abstract: 4 Laryngoscope, 125:1093-1097, 2015.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One may argue that clinicians would not use a size 8.0 ETT in patients with 1.6 or 2.4 cm tracheas. However, patients are not routinely scanned to assess tracheal size prior to intubation and studies have shown the inaccuracies in clinicians assessing tracheal size [30]. Using a size 8.0 ETT in this range of trachea sizes, represents rigorous bench testing and better comparison to clinical practice and anatomical variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One may argue that clinicians would not use a size 8.0 ETT in patients with 1.6 or 2.4 cm tracheas. However, patients are not routinely scanned to assess tracheal size prior to intubation and studies have shown the inaccuracies in clinicians assessing tracheal size [30]. Using a size 8.0 ETT in this range of trachea sizes, represents rigorous bench testing and better comparison to clinical practice and anatomical variation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wrong size can cause tracheal ischemia (if too large) or facilitate aspiration (if too small) [29]. A recent study identified an inverse relationship between tracheal size and body mass index [30], highlighting potential difficulties in making accurate assessments. Therefore, ETTs need to account for anatomical variation and safeguard the trachea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature addressing extrinsic factors demonstrates that ETT size selection in male patients should consider height as a predictive measure of tracheal size rather than BMI (26 – 27). To this point, D’Anza showed a trend of smaller airways with increasing BMI and concluded that avoiding larger tubes in obese patients would reduce airway injury (27). Halum et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El peso ideal debe utilizarse para calcular el tamaño de los tubos orotraqueales y el volumen corriente durante la ventilación controlada. El diámetro traqueal se reduce ligeramente con el aumento de índice de masa corporal 27 . Ningún modo particular de ventilación controlada ha demostrado ser superior en pacientes obesos, sin embargo, mayores volúmenes corrientes para una presión máxima determinada pueden lograrse utilizando la ventilación controlada por presión, en vez de por volumen 3 .…”
Section: Tabla 8 Estrategias Perioperatorias Para Disminuir El Riesgunclassified