Does boardroom gender diversity affect the risk profile of acquiring banks?

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of gender diversity on the boardroom and in top management positions on the risk profile (RP) of acquiring banks. Design/methodology/approach To estimate the effect of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in the RP of the acquirer, the authors will use the same methodology adopted by Vallascas and Hagendorff (2011), this method compares the variation of the RP of the acquirer to the level risk of control banks. To investigate how merger-related risk changes are affected by gender diversity, the authors use a linear regression. Findings The results show that, on average, bank mergers do not significantly affect the RP of the acquiring bank. However, the authors found that the proportion of women in the board standing reduces the RP of the acquiring bank. Overall, the authors observe evidence that the appearance of a female in top management is associated with lower bank risk. Moreover, the authors conclude that the relationship between the presence of at least three women on the board and the default risk of the acquiring bank is negative. Originality/value This finding suggests that in the M&A transactions, female directors are considerably more conservative than their male counterparts. Thus, the authors confirm the postulate that women are more risk averse and less overconfident than their male counterpart. The conclusions are of particular significance for the banking industry. The authors provide some support for the view that regulators should favor gender quotas in the board management of banks to reduce risk-taking behavior.

Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions

“…Table 3 shows that 32 papers use multicountry data (e.g., Adusei & Obeng, 2019; Gallego‐Álvarez & Pucheta‐Martínez, 2020; Gangi, Meles, D'Angelo, & Daniele, 2019; García‐Meca et al, 2015), with 10 of these researches focusing only on European context (Boitan & Niţescu, 2019; Farag & Mallin, 2017; Fernandes et al, 2016; Sghaier & Hamza, 2018). Also, the US market is evaluated by other 10 empirical research articles, the United Kingdom by five articles, Turkey by four articles, and Spain by four articles.…”

Board diversity and investment efficiency: evidence from China

“…For example, by conducting a meta-analysis of 150 studies on “gender differences in risk taking,” Byrnes et al (1999) and Hoang et al (2019) concluded that males take more risk as compared to females. Similarly, women invest less and therefore are more risk-averse than their male counterparts (Charness and Gneezy, 2012; Sghaier and Hamza, 2018). In another study, for example, Levi et al (2014) reported that female directors at the firm’s upper echelon are comparatively less aggressive than male directors at the time of acquisition.…”

Does gender diversity on boards influence stock market liquidity? Empirical evidence from the French market

“…In fact, it is highly argued that women are more risk-averse than man (Croson and Gneezy, 2009). Accordingly, genderdiversity on corporate boards could reduce the likelihood of excessive risk-taking (Sghaier andHamza, 2018, Faccio et al, 2016;Loukil and Yousfi, 2016;Cosentino et al, 2012;Jianakoplos and Bernasek, 1998). Hence, increasing gender diversity on corporate boards can better protect shareholders' interests, particularly the interests of minority shareholders.…”