2020
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2020.1296.79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does “blue” light invariably cause plant compactness? Not really: a comparison with red light in four bedding plant species during the transplant stage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the plant elongation promoted by blue light from LED lighting was found to be related to a low phytochrome activity, 2 of 14 which may reduce cryptochrome activity and increase phytotropin activity, due to a crosstalk between different light receptors [15,[19][20][21][22]. The promoted plant elongation under blue vs. red light has been confirmed by a series of studies using LED lights at different photoperiods, light intensities, and peak wavelengths, although the response sensitivity varies with light environments, plant species, and growth stages [14,[23][24][25][26]. However, whether the response sensitivity can be affected by temperature is still unknown and needs to be studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast, the plant elongation promoted by blue light from LED lighting was found to be related to a low phytochrome activity, 2 of 14 which may reduce cryptochrome activity and increase phytotropin activity, due to a crosstalk between different light receptors [15,[19][20][21][22]. The promoted plant elongation under blue vs. red light has been confirmed by a series of studies using LED lights at different photoperiods, light intensities, and peak wavelengths, although the response sensitivity varies with light environments, plant species, and growth stages [14,[23][24][25][26]. However, whether the response sensitivity can be affected by temperature is still unknown and needs to be studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We found that there are reported discrepancies in the morphological responses to blue vs. red LED light for plants under conditions other than an in vitro environment. Specifically, blue LED light was found to promote stem or leaf elongation in eggplants [ 23 , 24 ], cherry tomatoes [ 25 ], cucumber [ 26 , 27 ], watermelon [ 28 ], sesame [ 29 ], arugula [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ], kale [ 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 ], cabbage [ 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 37 ], sunflowers [ 16 , 38 ], peas [ 39 ], calibrachoa [ 19 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 ], petunias [ 17 , 21 , 22 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ], marigolds [ 18 , 40 , 42 , 43 ], geraniums [ 40 , 42 , 43 ], tulips [ 45 ], and wild Arabidopsis [ 46 , 47 , 48 ], compared to ...…”
Section: A Scientific Consensus Has Been Revised By Discoveries From ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach involves adding gradually increasing amounts of FR light (i.e., gradually decreasing R/FR ratios) to BR, from 0 to 6%. In further experiments with bedding plants and microgreens, four impure BL treatments were established in addition to R and B [ 33 , 41 , 42 ]. These four impure BL treatments, denoted as BRF0, BRF2, BRF4, and BRF6, were created by blending B with a low-level (6%) R and further adding 0, 2, 4, and 6 µmol m −2 s −1 of FR light, respectively.…”
Section: The Purity Of Blue Light May Affect Plants’ Elongation Respo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations