2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2332265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does Beauty Matter in Undergraduate Education?

Abstract: Abstract:Physically attractive individuals achieve greater success in terms of earnings and status than those who are less attractive. However, much about the mechanism behind this "beauty premium" remains unknown. We use a rich dataset to shed light on its nature at the college level. We find that students judged to be more attractive perform significantly worse on standardized tests but, conditional on test scores, are not evaluated more favorably at the point of admission.Controlling for test scores, more a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most studies actually measure attractiveness from facial photographs, rated by undergraduate students or other individuals (Biddle and Hamermesh, 1998;Deryugina and Shurchkov, 2015;Hitsch, Hortaçsu and Ariely, 2010;Mobius and Rosenblat, 2006;Scholz and Sicinski, 2015). For instance, Biddle and Hamermesh (1998) consider matriculation photographs of law school students, Deryugina and Shurchkov (2015) retrieve those from student ID cards in a women's college, while Scholz and Sicinski (2015) use senior year high school yearbook photographs for male high-school graduates from Wisconsin.…”
Section: Facial Attractiveness Versus Full-body Attractivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies actually measure attractiveness from facial photographs, rated by undergraduate students or other individuals (Biddle and Hamermesh, 1998;Deryugina and Shurchkov, 2015;Hitsch, Hortaçsu and Ariely, 2010;Mobius and Rosenblat, 2006;Scholz and Sicinski, 2015). For instance, Biddle and Hamermesh (1998) consider matriculation photographs of law school students, Deryugina and Shurchkov (2015) retrieve those from student ID cards in a women's college, while Scholz and Sicinski (2015) use senior year high school yearbook photographs for male high-school graduates from Wisconsin.…”
Section: Facial Attractiveness Versus Full-body Attractivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Biddle and Hamermesh (1998) consider matriculation photographs of law school students, Deryugina and Shurchkov (2015) retrieve those from student ID cards in a women's college, while Scholz and Sicinski (2015) use senior year high school yearbook photographs for male high-school graduates from Wisconsin. Hitsch, Hortaçsu and Ariely (2010) estimate mate preferences and sorting patterns from an online dating service in the US, using profile photographs uploaded by users and rated by students, with photographs available only for 27.5% of the sample (a self-rated attractiveness measure is also used).…”
Section: Facial Attractiveness Versus Full-body Attractivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Von Bose (2012) [76] and [14] both show that physical attractive is positively correlated with high school GPA and university overall GPA. Others have shown that beauty and ability are complements at high levels of beauty, but substitutes at low levels (Fletcher 2009) [21].…”
Section: Beauty Correlated With Cognitive/ Non-cognitive Skillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the consumer culture encourages people to view the skin, particularly the women's skin, as something that always needs constant processing in order to be protected against the passage of time, in such a way that the skin can maintain its gender difference in the form of the softness of feeling [16]. The body acts as an intermediate between consumption and personal identity, and has become the main arena for exposing the differences [5,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The body acts as an intermediate between consumption and personal identity, and has become the main arena for exposing the differences [5,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%