Does autogenous bone graft work? A logistic regression analysis of data from 159 papers in the foot and ankle literature

Lareau, Craig R.; Deren, Matthew E.; Fantry, Amanda; Donahue, Rafe; DiGiovanni, Christopher W.

doi:10.1016/j.fas.2015.03.008

Cited by 55 publications

(45 citation statements)

References 148 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…), there is a disposition for sticking to a pattern in a scientific society, which can cause a ‘snowball effect’ with citations, as authors are inclined towards a publication that is already abundantly cited rather than re‐assessing its relevance and quality (Lareau et al . ). Nevertheless, an opposite trend has been observed in the current study since 99% of the papers were published after 1999.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To identify and analyse the main features of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals from 1961 to 2018. Methodology The Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science ‘All Databases’ was used to search and analyse the 100 most frequently cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses having ‘randomized’, ‘randomised’, ‘randomized controlled’, ‘randomised controlled’, ‘randomized controlled trial’, ‘randomized controlled trials’, ‘clinical trial’, ‘systematic’, ‘systematic review’, ‘meta‐analysis’, and ‘meta‐analyses’ in the title section. The ‘International Endodontic Journal’, ‘Journal of Endodontics’, ‘Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology’, ‘Australian Endodontic Journal’, ‘Endodontics & Dental Traumatology’, ‘Endo‐Endodontic Practice Today’ and ‘European Endodontic Journal’ were included in the publication name section. After ranking the articles in a descending order based on their citation counts, each article was cross‐matched with the citation counts in Elsevier's Scopus and Google Scholar. The articles were analysed, and information on citation counts, citation density, year of publication, contributing authors, institutions and countries, journal of publication, study design, topic of the article and keywords was extracted. Results The citation counts of the 100 most‐cited articles varied from 235 to 20 (Web of Science), 276 to 17 (Scopus) and 696 to 1 (Google Scholar). The year in which the top 100 articles were published was 2010 (n = 13). Among 373 authors, the greatest number of articles was associated with three individuals namely Reader A (n = 5), Beck M (n = 5) and Kvist T (n = 5). Most of the articles originated from the United States (n = 24) with the greatest contribution from Ohio State University (USA) (n = 5). Randomized controlled trials were the most frequent study design (n = 45) followed by systematic reviews (n = 30) with outcome studies of root canal treatment being the major topic (n = 35). The Journal of Endodontics published the largest number of included articles (n = 70) followed by the International Endodontic Journal (n = 27). Among 259 unique keywords, meta‐analysis (n = 23) and systematic review (n = 23) were the most frequently used. Conclusion This study has revealed that year of publication had no obvious impact on citation count. The bibliometric analysis highlighted the quantity and quality of research, and the evolution of scientific advancements made in the field of Endodontology over time. Articles before 1996, that is prior to the CONSORT statement that encouraged authors to include specific terms in the title and keywords, may not have been included in this electronic search.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To our knowledge, there have been no biomechanical studies of the mode of fixation in calcaneal allografts. We attached the calcaneal allograft by double arthrodesis avoiding the talonavicular joint and using spongy autograft from the iliac bone [11]. The authors dealt with different fixation regarding the type of reconstruction: subtalar fixation [2, 5, 6] or double arthrodesis [4, 8].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Delayed Reconstruction by Total Calcaneal Allograft following Calcanectomy: Is It an Option?

Degeorge

Dagneaux

Forget

et al. 2016

Case Reports in Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many options are available in literature for the management of delayed reconstruction following calcanectomy. In cases of low-grade tumor lesions, conservative surgery can be considered. We describe a case of delayed reconstruction by calcaneal allograft after calcanectomy for low-grade chondrosarcoma. At 12-month follow-up, the patient had no pain; MSTS score and AOFAS score were satisfactory. Subtalar nonunion was observed with no secondary displacement or graft necrosis. The aim of conservative treatment for this patient was to restore normal gait with plantigrade locomotion and function of the Achilles tendon. Calcaneal reconstruction by total allograft is an alternative approach following calcanectomy for calcaneal tumors. We also discussed other options of calcaneal reconstruction.

show abstract

“…Autologous corticocancellous bone graft (autograft) placed between the joint surfaces to be fused, has historically been the gold standard [9][10][11]. However, since harvesting autograft bone results in well-known complications [12][13][14][15], CBA has been used since it lacks the patient morbidity associated with autograft harvest yet shares the three characteristics that are required for effective bone formation, an osteoconductive scaffold, osteoinductive growth factors and osteogenic cells.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Autologous corticocancellous bone graft (autograft) placed between the joint surfaces to be fused, has historically been the gold standard in procedures that require bone grafting [9][10][11]. However, harvesting autograft bone results in well-known complications [12][13][14][15] and the bone quality can be poor especially in older individuals or patients with significant comorbidities [16,17].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Retrospective Clinical Comparison of Two Allogeneic Bone Matrices Containing Viable Osteogenic Cells in Patients Undergoing Foot and/or Ankle Arthrodesis

Loveland¹,

Waldorff²,

He³

et al. 2017

J Stem Cell Res Ther

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Does autogenous bone graft work? A logistic regression analysis of data from 159 papers in the foot and ankle literature

Cited by 55 publications

References 148 publications

A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals

A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals

Delayed Reconstruction by Total Calcaneal Allograft following Calcanectomy: Is It an Option?

A Retrospective Clinical Comparison of Two Allogeneic Bone Matrices Containing Viable Osteogenic Cells in Patients Undergoing Foot and/or Ankle Arthrodesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About