2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000468
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does audit and feedback improve the adoption of recommended practices? Evidence from a longitudinal observational study of an emerging clinical network in Kenya

Abstract: BackgroundAudit and feedback (A&F) is widely used in healthcare but there are few examples of how to deploy it at scale in low-income countries. Establishing the Clinical Information Network (CIN) in Kenya provided an opportunity to examine the effect of A&F delivered as part of a wider set of activities to promote paediatric guideline adherence.MethodsWe analysed data collected from medical records on discharge for children aged 2–59 months from 14 Kenyan hospitals in the CIN. Hospitals joined CIN in phases a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This further demonstrates the value addition to immunization coverage that CHVs' involvement in child immunization services can offer. In this study, the use of CHVs, coupled with integrated audit and feedback activities embedded in the community by the CHVs, improved the overall adoption of recommended immunization practices over time [48]. We posit that engaging CHVs in regular data collection in the households provided for increased contact with household members, which afforded them opportunities for enhanced health education and promotion, including tracing defaulters of essential health services such as vaccinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This further demonstrates the value addition to immunization coverage that CHVs' involvement in child immunization services can offer. In this study, the use of CHVs, coupled with integrated audit and feedback activities embedded in the community by the CHVs, improved the overall adoption of recommended immunization practices over time [48]. We posit that engaging CHVs in regular data collection in the households provided for increased contact with household members, which afforded them opportunities for enhanced health education and promotion, including tracing defaulters of essential health services such as vaccinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since ‘ideal’ prescribing rates are likely to vary by infectious condition,35 36 surveillance using prescription or sales data alone (without information on diagnosis or documentation on the need for antibiotics) may hide differences in case mix and context of care. Routine data on primary care delivery, combined with audit and feedback, also has the advantage of being actionable at facility level,37 38 and presents a powerful and widely studied and used tool to affect clinician practices 13. This study argues for a similar approach to combat global AMR in LMICs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Provider training and/or clinical decision support (CDS) systems could close knowledge gaps,12 but overcoming barriers of attitude or behaviour may require investment in quality improvement (QI) efforts through routine audit and feedback strategies 13 14. Routine data on the management of common infectious diseases can provide rich insights into the problem of antibiotic overuse in primary care settings, but in LMIC settings such data are difficult to collect,15 and efforts to link routine data to regular audit and feedback cycles are rare 13. Furthermore, the private sector is playing an increasingly vital role in healthcare delivery in LMICs but with little support for systematic QI across a fragmented healthcare market 16 17.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From preliminary analysis, missing data in pneumonia care processes varied within and between PAQC score domains. The rate of missingness could be explained by complexity underlying individual tasks [44]. That is, care processes (PAQC subcomponents) perceived to require more cognitive effort (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%