2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2147547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does an Improved Experience of Law School Protect Students from Depression, Anxiety and Stress? An Empirical Study of Wellbeing and the Law School Experience of LLB and JD Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies in the academic field have shown that exam anxiety is negatively related to academic performance [35], psychological well-being [36], social relations [37], and physical well-being [38]. In contrast, exam anxiety has been positively related to stress [39], frustration [40], dropping out of school [41], and depression [40].…”
Section: Test Anxiety and Academic Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies in the academic field have shown that exam anxiety is negatively related to academic performance [35], psychological well-being [36], social relations [37], and physical well-being [38]. In contrast, exam anxiety has been positively related to stress [39], frustration [40], dropping out of school [41], and depression [40].…”
Section: Test Anxiety and Academic Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research findings that law students enter law school with levels of well-being similar to the general population and other student groups and yet during law school display higher levels of distress compared with similar professional degrees (Benjamin et al, 1986;Sheldon & Krieger, 2004), suggests that there are unique provoking stressors in the law school environment (Tani & Vines, 2009). In support of this argument, a number of stressors in law school have been reported, including: heavy workload (Australian Law Students Association, 2010;Benjamin et al, 1986;Sheldon & Krieger, 2004); the Socratic teaching method (Dresser, 2005;Gutierrez, 1985;Pritchard & McIntosh, 2003); limited feedback on performance (Daicoff, 1997;Dresser, 2005); heavily weighted examinations (Dresser, 2005;Heins, Fahey, & Henderson, 1983;Larcombe, Tumbaga, Malkin, Nicholson, & Tokatlidis, 2013); uncertainty in what is expected of students (Daicoff, 1997); difficult content (Heins et al, 1983); competitiveness among students (Daicoff, 1997;Gutierrez, 1985;Pritchard & McIntosh, 2003;Sheldon & Krieger, 2004;Tani & Vines, 2009), in particular competition for grades , employment opportunities (Dresser, 2005) and summer clerkships ; competitiveness for getting an advantage over other students (Stallman, 2012); the resultsfocused culture (Tani & Vines, 2009); lack of social connectedness (Tani & Vines, 2009); social isolation (Daicoff, 1997;Pritchard & McIntosh, 2003); having limited time for recreation, friends and family Pritchard & McIntosh, 2003); difficulties maintaining personal relationships and balancing work commitments (Dresser, 200...…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomous self-regulation, which encompasses a range of types of self-endorsed motivations that promote self-management, has been repeatedly demonstrated to conduce 'engagement and optimal learning in educational contexts" (Niemiec & Ryan, 2009, p. 133). These understandings are reinforced by empirical research indicating that law students who do not experience law school as supportive of autonomy are more likely to experience elevated levels of psychological distress (Larcombe, et al, 2013;Sheldon & Krieger, 2007).…”
Section: The Linkages Between Self-determination Theory Independent mentioning
confidence: 99%