2020
DOI: 10.1080/13488678.2019.1706135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does an ELF phonology exist?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The curriculum largely stood on the nativeness principle that "holds it is both possible and desirable [for L2 speakers] to achieve native-like pronunciation" (Levis, 2005: 370), using the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis (CAH) (e.g., see Cunningham, 2015;Sylvén, 2013), which predicts non-native speakers' pronunciation features in view of their L1 phonological systems and regards such features, when present, as 'errors' that should be removed or corrected (see Munro, 2018 for a critical discussion of the CAH in pronunciation teaching). By contrast, Jeong explicitly rejects native-speaker-centric views (Jeong, Thorén & Othman, 2017, 2020, instead relying on the intelligibility principle that "holds that [speakers] simply need to be understandable" without having to emulate 'standard' native speaker accents (Levis, 2005: 370).…”
Section: How It Startedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The curriculum largely stood on the nativeness principle that "holds it is both possible and desirable [for L2 speakers] to achieve native-like pronunciation" (Levis, 2005: 370), using the Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis (CAH) (e.g., see Cunningham, 2015;Sylvén, 2013), which predicts non-native speakers' pronunciation features in view of their L1 phonological systems and regards such features, when present, as 'errors' that should be removed or corrected (see Munro, 2018 for a critical discussion of the CAH in pronunciation teaching). By contrast, Jeong explicitly rejects native-speaker-centric views (Jeong, Thorén & Othman, 2017, 2020, instead relying on the intelligibility principle that "holds that [speakers] simply need to be understandable" without having to emulate 'standard' native speaker accents (Levis, 2005: 370).…”
Section: How It Startedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the fact that it is hard for most students to understand that phonemes are not actual sounds but abstract ones, once symbols are used to represent phonemes, the sound values the symbols represent are perceived as 'ideal' sounds to be emulated, hence to some extent reinforcing the already entrenched standard language ideology. In fact, the concept of phonemes, shared conceptions/abstractions of a sound segment within a single speech community, may not fit Global Englishes phonetics, which deals with diverse segmental variation in different speech communities (O'Neal, 2020). As an alternative to involving the phoneme and phone distinction, Jeong has adapted the idea behind Wells' (1982) lexical set, using English orthography to help students explore Global Englishes phonetic/phonological varieties in a non-discriminatory way.…”
Section: How Teaching and Learning Has Proceededmentioning
confidence: 99%