2014
DOI: 10.1111/een.12098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does allometry of a sexually selected ornamental trait vary with sexual selection intensity? A multi‐species test in damselflies

Abstract: Ornaments may show hyperallometry in certain taxa, i.e. large individuals have proportionally larger ornaments than small ones. One hypothesis suggests that higher sexual selection intensity leads to steeper hyperallometric patterns. This study tested whether an ornamental trait subject to both intra‐ and intersexual selection showed steeper allometric slopes than when subject solely to intrasexual selection. The study employed the sexually selected male wing pigmentation of 14 calopterygid species (damselflie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…), co‐option of signals for courtship may lead to exaggeration of the signaling structure in speciose clades, although little empirical data exist on whether dual‐utility traits reach larger sizes than do pure ornaments or pure armaments (Outomuro et al. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), co‐option of signals for courtship may lead to exaggeration of the signaling structure in speciose clades, although little empirical data exist on whether dual‐utility traits reach larger sizes than do pure ornaments or pure armaments (Outomuro et al. ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only does the preexisting trait hypothesis predict that male-male aggressive displays will predate displays for courtship (Berglund et al 1996), but as female choice becomes important in mate selection, this may lead to accelerated evolution of ornament size (Andersson 1994;Emlen 2008). As increases in ornamentation are known to be associated with speciation (Gomes et al 2016), co-option of signals for courtship may lead to exaggeration of the signaling structure in speciose clades, although little empirical data exist on whether dual-utility traits reach larger sizes than do pure ornaments or pure armaments (Outomuro et al 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured morphological variables from the derived image using imagej (NIH, Bethesda, Maryland) (Abràmoff et al, 2004): red and black wing spot area and right forewing area as a proxy of body size. Wing area is confirmed to be a good indicator of body size and is highly correlated with total length (Hardersen, 2010;Sacchi & Hardersen, 2012;Outomuro et al, 2014;Bello-Bedoy et al, 2015). Additionally, we measured the morphometric variables of 15 randomly chosen individuals twice and estimated measurement error (Bailey & Byrnes, 1990).…”
Section: Measurement Of Morphological Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males of this family usually present a conspicuous wing spot whose colour can be, in general, red or black, depending on the species (Córdoba-Aguilar & Cordero-Rivera, 2005;Svensson & Waller, 2013). More remarkable than colour, in some genera of the Calopterygidae family, such as Calopteryx, Hetaerina and Mnais, spot size shows large inter-and intraspecific variation (Hooper et al, 1999;Anderson, & Grether 2010a, b;Outomuro et al, 2014;Drury et al, 2015a), with very consistent hyper-allometric patterns (Outomuro et al, 2014) for which size is positively related to mating success (Córdoba-Aguilar & Cordero-Rivera, 2005;Córdoba-Aguilar & González-Tokman, 2014). Different sources indicate that these wing spots are 'honest', condition-dependent traits because individuals with a larger expression of spots survive for longer (Grether, 1997;González-Santoyo et al, 2014) and respond more strongly to immune challenges (Siva-Jothy, 2000;Rantala et al, 2000;Koskimäki et al, 2004;Contreras-Garduño et al, 2006, 2007 and diet stress (Álvarez et al, 2013) than males with smaller wing spots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, Rensch in his original proposition argued that selection on secondary sexual characters was responsible for sexual dimorphism (Rensch, 1960). To the best of our knowledge, most tests of Rensch's rule to date have focused on size dimorphism (but see Outomuro et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%