2017
DOI: 10.1177/0300060516675682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does a social/behavioural gradient in dental health exist among adults? A cross-sectional study

Abstract: ObjectiveTo explore the potential presence of a social/behavioural gradient in dental health among Italian adults using a cross-sectional study.MethodsCaries indices were recorded among 480 subjects (52.9% men, 47.1% women) who also completed a structured self-administered social and behavioural questionnaire. A social/behavioural gradient was generated as the sum of the worst circumstances recorded on the questionnaire (cariogenic diet, smoking, lowest occupational profile, brushing teeth < twice daily, lowes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
21
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
5
21
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there was not a statistically significant association between lesion depth and patient risk, it is interesting to note that persons at elevated risk had a high percentage of their lesions into dentin (67%; n=204), with small percentages of their SOCLs with no caries (3%; n=8), inactive caries (5%; n=16), or into the enamel only (25%; n=77). These findings are consistent with other studies that have shown that patients in elevated-risk categories are at greater risk for future caries and this is an important factor to consider when developing a treatment plan 3233 . Our results suggest that patient risk influenced decisions to open lesions, as elevated-risk prevalence was higher among opened lesions (52%; n=305) than in the overall sample (35%; n=554).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although there was not a statistically significant association between lesion depth and patient risk, it is interesting to note that persons at elevated risk had a high percentage of their lesions into dentin (67%; n=204), with small percentages of their SOCLs with no caries (3%; n=8), inactive caries (5%; n=16), or into the enamel only (25%; n=77). These findings are consistent with other studies that have shown that patients in elevated-risk categories are at greater risk for future caries and this is an important factor to consider when developing a treatment plan 3233 . Our results suggest that patient risk influenced decisions to open lesions, as elevated-risk prevalence was higher among opened lesions (52%; n=305) than in the overall sample (35%; n=554).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…34 Arrica ve ark.nın çalışmasında, sigara kullananların DMFT oranının (11,36) sigara kullanmayanlardan yüksek (9,56) olduğu ve DMFT oranı ile sigara kullanımı arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı ilişki olduğu ifade edilmiştir. 35 Al-Habashneh ve ark.nın çalışmasında, sigara kullanımı ile DMFT oranı arasında istatistiksel anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirtilmiştir. 36 Aguilar-Zinser ve ark.nın çalışmasında, sigara kullananların DMFT oranının 8,80, sigara kullanmayanların ise 8,55 olduğu ve sigara içen ve kötü oral hijyene sahip bireylerde çok sayıda diş çürükleri ve eksik dişler bulunduğu belirtilmiştir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The mean DMFT scores varied largely between 6.6 and 17.6, as shown in Figure 1. The median of the reported DMFT scores for all countries was 12.1 [Skudutyte et al, 2000;Vrbic, 2000;Menghini et al, 2002;Ivanković et al, 2003;Tubert-Jeannin et al, 2004;Broukal et al, 2006;Madléna DOI: 10.1159/000492676 et al, 2008Suominen-Taipale et al, 2008;Gökalp et al, 2010;Kuzmina et al, 2010;Holst and Schuller, 2011;Pashayev et al, 2011;Yudina et al, 2011;Damyanov et al, 2012;Llodra Calvo, 2012;Mamai-Homata et al, 2012;Kongstad et al, 2013;Bernabé and Sheiham, 2014;Schuller et al, 2014;Bottenberg et al, 2015;Calado et al, 2015;Jordan and Micheelis, 2016;Arrica et al, 2017].…”
Section: Mean Number Of Dmft Scores In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%